Skip to content

Conversation

vonzshik
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #5835

@vonzshik vonzshik requested a review from roji as a code owner September 13, 2024 10:41
@NinoFloris NinoFloris force-pushed the 5835-fix-composite-with-enum branch from 7057d4f to 9a1b561 Compare September 17, 2024 13:59
@NinoFloris NinoFloris force-pushed the 5835-fix-composite-with-enum branch from 9a1b561 to d57146d Compare September 27, 2024 13:59
@NinoFloris
Copy link
Member

Regarding #5841 which is an improvement to the accuracy of the buffer requirements. We can choose to still take + backport it after this one, for correctness just this PR is enough though.

@vonzshik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Regarding #5841 which is an improvement to the accuracy of the buffer requirements. We can choose to still take + backport it after this one, for correctness just this PR is enough though.

There was also an improvement with allowing enums to be written without buffering but yeah, I'll just do a separate pr containing both of them, and it's not like we have to backport that.

@vonzshik vonzshik merged commit 53b9fa5 into main Oct 13, 2024
15 checks passed
@vonzshik vonzshik deleted the 5835-fix-composite-with-enum branch October 13, 2024 04:11
vonzshik added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2024
Fixes #5835

Co-authored-by: Nino Floris <mail@ninofloris.com>
(cherry picked from commit 53b9fa5)
@vonzshik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Backported to 8.0.5 via 8a19263

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Arithmetic overflow executing a query with a composite type parameter that contains an enum
2 participants