Skip to content

chore: fix function in comment #4325

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 13, 2025
Merged

chore: fix function in comment #4325

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 13, 2025

Conversation

bytetigers
Copy link
Contributor

@bytetigers bytetigers commented Jul 8, 2025

Description

fix function in comment

Related Issues

Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Documentation update
  • Refactor
  • Other (please describe):

Checklist

Please review and check all that apply:

  • My code follows the project’s coding style
  • I have tested the changes locally
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed
  • I have added tests that prove my fix/feature works (or explain why not)
  • All existing and new tests pass

How to Test

Screenshots / Demos (if applicable)

Additional Notes

Signed-off-by: bytetigers <bytetiger@icloud.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @bytetigers, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor documentation update by fixing a function name within a code comment. The change ensures that the comment accurately describes the associated function, improving code readability and consistency.

Highlights

  • Documentation Correction: Corrected a function name in a comment within model/metadata/persistent_ids.go to accurately reflect the function createGetPID.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request fixes an incorrect function name in a comment. The change is correct, but I've suggested a further improvement to the comment to more accurately describe the function's behavior, as it's a factory function that returns another function, rather than directly returning a value.

@deluan
Copy link
Member

deluan commented Jul 9, 2025

Thanks for catching this, but I agree with Gemini. Can you reword the comment like suggested?

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@deluan deluan merged commit d8e829a into navidrome:master Jul 13, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants