Skip to content

Conversation

BobbieGoede
Copy link
Member

🔗 Linked issue

📚 Description

Resolves #32743

This way the order of plugins won't break the setup of unrelated plugins.

@BobbieGoede BobbieGoede requested a review from danielroe as a code owner July 24, 2025 17:10
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@BobbieGoede BobbieGoede changed the title fix: execute plugins after plugin failure fix(nuxt): execute plugins after plugin failure Jul 24, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update import paths for several internal Nuxt app types from relative paths using ../app/ to local paths using ./, reflecting a module reorganisation. In the applyPlugins function, the error handling logic is simplified by replacing an array-based collection of all plugin errors with a single error variable capturing the first encountered error. Parallel plugin promises are pushed without individual .catch handlers, while non-parallel plugins are awaited directly with conditional error rethrowing. After all plugins complete, if an error was captured, it is thrown with priority given to nuxtApp.payload.error if it exists.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 980a04f and 03570c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/nuxt/src/app/nuxt.ts (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/nuxt/src/app/nuxt.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: code
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

@nuxt/kit

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/kit@32744

nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/nuxt@32744

@nuxt/rspack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/rspack-builder@32744

@nuxt/schema

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/schema@32744

@nuxt/vite-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/vite-builder@32744

@nuxt/webpack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/webpack-builder@32744

commit: 03570c5

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jul 24, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #32744 will not alter performance

Comparing BobbieGoede:fix/keep-executing-plugins-after-plugin-failure (03570c5) with main (7f11348)

Summary

✅ 10 untouched benchmarks

Copy link
Member

@danielroe danielroe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes sense to me. I think originally this might have been because we wanted to avoid other plugins erroring if they depended on the broken original plugin.

... but as we are already handling an array of errors, I think it makes sense.

maybe we could even move the .catch to where the promise is defined to avoid duplicating on L448

@BobbieGoede
Copy link
Member Author

BobbieGoede commented Jul 25, 2025

maybe we could even move the .catch to where the promise is defined to avoid duplicating on L448

Done!

This makes sense to me. I think originally this might have been because we wanted to avoid other plugins erroring if they depended on the broken original plugin.
... but as we are already handling an array of errors, I think it makes sense.

We're collecting errors in an array but only throwing the first error on L474, do we plan to make those other errors visible someday? Hiding the errors from plugins depending on a broken plugin makes sense to me though, but (with this change) it's possible unrelated plugins will error too.

Copy link
Member

@danielroe danielroe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what about we only short-circuit running the plugins if we aren't rendering an error page?

@danielroe danielroe force-pushed the fix/keep-executing-plugins-after-plugin-failure branch from 2afd278 to 4c0a18c Compare July 28, 2025 16:23
@danielroe danielroe changed the title fix(nuxt): execute plugins after plugin failure fix(nuxt): always throw first error when rendering error page Jul 28, 2025
@danielroe
Copy link
Member

sorry for the back and forth! 🤦

hopefully this is still good!

@danielroe danielroe changed the title fix(nuxt): always throw first error when rendering error page fix(nuxt): execute all plugins after error rendering error.vue Jul 28, 2025
@danielroe danielroe merged commit 7831bee into nuxt:main Jul 28, 2025
82 of 84 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jul 28, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jul 28, 2025
}).catch((e) => {
// short circuit if we are not rendering `error.vue`
if (!plugin.parallel && !nuxtApp.payload.error) {
throw error
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@danielroe
This should probably be throw e, right? 👀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Plugin error is obfuscated by errors caused by skipped plugins
3 participants