Skip to content

test: fix flaky tests #32558

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2025
Merged

test: fix flaky tests #32558

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2025

Conversation

jcppman
Copy link
Contributor

@jcppman jcppman commented Jul 8, 2025

Fixed a flaky test case that relies on the system timezone

🔗 Linked issue

#32557

📚 Description

Fix #32557 by passing the timezone in

@jcppman jcppman requested a review from danielroe as a code owner July 8, 2025 06:14
@bolt-new-by-stackblitz Bolt.new (by StackBlitz)
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The test for the <NuxtTime> component was updated to explicitly specify the timeZone: 'UTC' option in the date formatting properties passed to the component. This adjustment ensures that the rendered datetime string in the test output uses the UTC timezone. No changes were made to logic, control flow, or error handling, and there were no alterations to exported or public entity declarations.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ec5014 and 53506df.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/nuxt/nuxt-time.test.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • test/nuxt/nuxt-time.test.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: codeql (actions)
  • GitHub Check: codeql (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: code
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jcppman
test: fix flaky tests
53506df 
Fixed a flaky test case that relies on the system timezone
@jcppman jcppman force-pushed the flaky-nuxt-time-test branch from 6ec5014 to 53506df Compare July 8, 2025 06:17
@pkg-pr-new pkg.pr.new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jul 8, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

@nuxt/kit

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/kit@32558

nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/nuxt@32558

@nuxt/rspack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/rspack-builder@32558

@nuxt/schema

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/schema@32558

@nuxt/vite-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/vite-builder@32558

@nuxt/webpack-builder

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/webpack-builder@32558

commit: 53506df

@codspeed-hq CodSpeed HQ
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jul 8, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #32558 will not alter performance

Comparing jcppman:flaky-nuxt-time-test (53506df) with main (0344123)

Summary

✅ 10 untouched benchmarks

@jcppman jcppman changed the title test(nuxt-time): fix flaky tests test: fix flaky tests Jul 8, 2025
@danielroe danielroe merged commit 45d26c4 into nuxt:main Jul 8, 2025
46 of 47 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2025
Merged
danielroe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2025
@jcppman @danielroe
test: pass timeZone in to <NuxtTime> test (#32558)
be4f24c
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2025
Merged
@jcppman jcppman deleted the flaky-nuxt-time-test branch July 8, 2025 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@danielroe danielroe danielroe approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
4.x test
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NuxtTime: Flaky testcase
2 participants
@jcppman @danielroe