Fix {,e}println!()
#3205
Closed
Fix {,e}println!()
#3205
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the contribution @GrigorenkoPV!
Can you please add one? It can be placed under Thank you! |
Merged
zhassan-aws
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2024
GitHub closed the previous PR (#3205) after I renamed a branch, hooray. Change the implementation of `println!` & `eprintln!` with no arguments to call `print!("\n")` & `eprint!("\n")` respectively instead of producing no tokens. This is what std does. [^println][^eprintln] [^println]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/8c127df75fde3d5ad8ef9af664962a7676288b52/library/std/src/macros.rs#L140 [^eprintln]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/8c127df75fde3d5ad8ef9af664962a7676288b52/library/std/src/macros.rs#L218 Resolves #3204. A test included, as per #3205 (comment)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change the implementation of
println!&eprintln!with no arguments to callprint!("\n")&
eprint!("\n")respectively instead of producing no tokens. This is what std does. 12Probably resolves #320. Haven't tested, sorry. It might also make sense to add a test for this.
Footnotes
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/8c127df75fde3d5ad8ef9af664962a7676288b52/library/std/src/macros.rs#L140 ↩
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/8c127df75fde3d5ad8ef9af664962a7676288b52/library/std/src/macros.rs#L218 ↩