-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
updating Context backtrack for new leaf misses. #482
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #482 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #482 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 49.15% 62.27% +13.11%
===========================================
Files 33 35 +2
Lines 2079 2330 +251
===========================================
+ Hits 1022 1451 +429
+ Misses 1057 879 -178 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Hi @martin-juhlin, would you mind rebasing your branch to be in sync with |
when matching similary pattern, this will update the Content::backtrack to incoming nodes miss value, if the miss is pointing to a leaf node, meaning if somehting fail later on, it can go expected value. adding some new test cases to verify that the new logic is working.
HI, @jeertmans, sure, no problem. I done an update :) |
Looks like your PR fixes way more issues than anticipated! I tested and it also fixes #279. That might be worth checking all issues that are fixed by the long-running issue, but it can also take some time ^^' Anyway, happy you came up with a solution! |
Is there anything that's blocking this PR from being merged? |
Not really blocking, I was just hoping we could invest some more time and test if other issues can be closed thanks to this fix. I would really appreciate it if someone could, for each of the bugs, check if that bug can solved by this PR and, if so, write a test that shows that the bug is now fixed. Similar to what is done here, but only for 3 issues. |
I see. What about publishing a pre-release version with this merged so we can ask the authors of said issues if they can update to the pre-release and if that fixes things / changes the behaviour? Might speed up the process. |
Hmm I don't have much time to spend on this, and not enough to, so I fear I would just forget about it or postpone this. I would prefer addressing this issue now ^^' |
when matching similary pattern, this will update the Content::backtrack to incoming nodes miss value, if the miss is pointing to a leaf node, meaning if somehting fail later on, it can go expected value.
adding some new test cases to verify that the new logic is working.