Skip to content

Conversation

dainemawer
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Fixes #193
Screenshot 2022-03-01 at 11 01 05

Relevant technical choices

Checklist

  • PR has either [Focus] or Infrastructure label.
  • PR has a [Type] label.
  • PR has a milestone or the no milestone label.

@dainemawer dainemawer added Infrastructure Issues for the overall performance plugin infrastructure Needs Review labels Mar 1, 2022
@dainemawer dainemawer added this to the 1.0.0-beta.1 milestone Mar 1, 2022
@dainemawer dainemawer requested a review from felixarntz as a code owner March 1, 2022 09:02
@dainemawer dainemawer added the [Type] Feature A new feature within an existing module label Mar 1, 2022
@jjgrainger jjgrainger self-requested a review March 1, 2022 14:05
Copy link
Contributor

@jjgrainger jjgrainger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good @dainemawer , just a couple of minor things to address.

Copy link
Member

@felixarntz felixarntz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dainemawer Left a couple of comments. This looks on the right track, but there's a lot of code here that can be simplified, and overall we need to be more careful of not enqueue things too aggressively.

@felixarntz felixarntz changed the base branch from trunk to release/1.0.0-beta.1 March 3, 2022 00:47
@felixarntz
Copy link
Member

@dainemawer FYI Since we've branched off from trunk into a release/1.0.0-beta.1 branch, I've updated the base branch of this PR to that new branch. So going forward, please make sure to work off release/1.0.0-beta.1, and specifically not merge trunk into this again.

@dainemawer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Roger that @felixarntz will fix the merge conflict here!

Copy link
Member

@felixarntz felixarntz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dainemawer Left a bit more feedback here, this is looking close now.

mitogh and others added 9 commits March 4, 2022 12:17
Co-authored-by: Felix Arntz <felixarntz@users.noreply.github.com>
Make sure the function is only added when need it.
Co-authored-by: Felix Arntz <felixarntz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Felix Arntz <felixarntz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Felix Arntz <felixarntz@users.noreply.github.com>
@mitogh mitogh requested a review from felixarntz March 4, 2022 19:05
Copy link
Member

@felixarntz felixarntz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome work @dainemawer!

Thanks @mitogh for the final iteration.

@felixarntz felixarntz dismissed jjgrainger’s stale review March 4, 2022 21:13

Feedback has been addressed.

Copy link
Member

@adamsilverstein adamsilverstein left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

one tiny spacing change to align the values, otherwise 👍🏼

Co-authored-by: Adam Silverstein <adamjs@google.com>
@mitogh mitogh merged commit fa5c12f into release/1.0.0-beta.1 Mar 4, 2022
@mitogh mitogh deleted the feature/add-admin-pointer branch March 4, 2022 23:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Infrastructure Issues for the overall performance plugin infrastructure [Type] Feature A new feature within an existing module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Provide admin pointer informing about the plugin's admin screen
5 participants