Skip to content

Conversation

eumiro
Copy link
Contributor

@eumiro eumiro commented Mar 29, 2025

This just consolidates the usage of hashbrown::hash_set::Entry across the project (except the changes done in #1405).

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 29, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 14148531979

Details

  • 26 of 27 (96.3%) changed or added relevant lines in 5 files are covered.
  • 2 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.009%) to 95.331%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
src/digraph.rs 15 16 93.75%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
rustworkx-core/src/generators/random_graph.rs 2 85.04%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 14146291322: -0.009%
Covered Lines: 18499
Relevant Lines: 19405

💛 - Coveralls

@eumiro eumiro force-pushed the consolidate-hashset-match branch from fb887d4 to 9c9a617 Compare March 29, 2025 18:59
Copy link
Collaborator

@IvanIsCoding IvanIsCoding left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, seems straightforward

@IvanIsCoding IvanIsCoding added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 29, 2025
Merged via the queue into Qiskit:main with commit c683aed Mar 29, 2025
31 checks passed
@eumiro eumiro deleted the consolidate-hashset-match branch March 31, 2025 18:44
SILIZ4 pushed a commit to SILIZ4/rustworkx that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants