Skip to content

Conversation

IvanIsCoding
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #1386

I opted to check at the Python level because it seemed simpler to handle the failures before calling rustworkx-core.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 16, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 13356946848

Details

  • 19 of 19 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 95.2%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 13320858474: -0.1%
Covered Lines: 18444
Relevant Lines: 19374

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@mtreinish mtreinish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM this is a straightforward fix, thanks for doing this.

@mtreinish mtreinish added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 15, 2025
Merged via the queue into Qiskit:main with commit 6257b1a Mar 15, 2025
31 of 32 checks passed
SILIZ4 pushed a commit to SILIZ4/rustworkx that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2025
…ces (Qiskit#1388)

* Validate source nodes in search functions

* Add tests for graph searches

* Add tests for digraph searches

* Black

* Add release notes

* Address clippy
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Panic in traversal
3 participants