Skip to content

Blocki and Alwen's second attack #182

@bryant

Description

@bryant

Hi,
bryant/argon2rs#18 brought to my attention an attack documented in https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/759.pdf. The paper has been around for a few months now and mentions that t_cost needs to be > 10. However, the t_cost in run.c is still 3. Is this attack a legitimate concern? Should run.c be patched to 10?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions