Skip to content

Conversation

robfrank
Copy link
Collaborator

@robfrank robfrank commented Jan 26, 2025

What does this PR do?

Fixes a test that is failing only on linux

Motivation

When enough is enoigh

Checklist

  • I have run the build using mvn clean package command
  • My unit tests cover both failure and success scenarios

Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (e8d817a) 68352 43999 64.37%
Head commit (bd265cc) 68352 (+0) 44000 (+1) 64.37% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#1935) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

@robfrank robfrank requested a review from lvca January 26, 2025 20:21
@robfrank robfrank marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2025 20:22
@robfrank robfrank added this to the 25.2.1 milestone Jan 26, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@lvca lvca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👏

@robfrank robfrank merged commit 30cb147 into main Jan 27, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@robfrank robfrank deleted the fix/failing-test branch June 20, 2025 07:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants