Built-in aerodynamic coefficients #636
Conversation
|
The proof of concept is done in the linear aerodynamics example |
|
I suggest you update the branch @mvanzulli |
Great, now local and remote tests are failing. 👍🏼 |
Codecov Report
📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more @@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #636 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 60.42% 60.77% +0.34%
==========================================
Files 148 150 +2
Lines 4910 4928 +18
==========================================
+ Hits 2967 2995 +28
+ Misses 1943 1933 -10
... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
|
@jorgepz suggested:
|
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pérez Zerpa <42485529+jorgepz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pérez Zerpa <42485529+jorgepz@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes #617
Now for
circularcorss sections we have drag formulation proposed in #617 zero lift and pitch. Also the interface has been simplified with a bluit-in default chord vector (in cases when the angle of incidence is not relevant) and numerical parameters such asnumGaussPointsstifnessAeroBoolandgeometricNonLinearare set with default values.