Skip to content

Conversation

pshirshov
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@pshirshov pshirshov requested a review from neko-kai as a code owner March 3, 2025 21:06
@neko-kai
Copy link
Member

neko-kai commented Mar 3, 2025

type X <: Null is more inhabited than type X <: Nothing. But, it's bad enough there's not much difference.

I think the inclusion of Null can only affect checks for the above type (and unions).

I think we may need tests for unions with Null

@neko-kai neko-kai merged commit 678ead5 into develop Mar 3, 2025
29 checks passed
@neko-kai neko-kai deleted the feature/basic-null-type-support branch March 3, 2025 21:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants