Skip to content

Conversation

cnlangzi
Copy link
Member

@cnlangzi cnlangzi commented Jan 23, 2025

Changed

Fixed

Added

  • added StringViewer

Tests

Tasks to complete before merging PR:

  • Ensure unit tests are passing. If not run make unit-test to check for any regressions 📋
  • Ensure lint tests are passing. if not run make lint to check for any issues
  • Ensure codecov/patch is passing for changes.

Summary by Sourcery

New Features:

  • Add a StringViewer that renders data as a string.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces a new StringViewer that renders data as a plain text string. It sets the Content-Type header to text/plain; charset=utf-8 and uses fmt.Fprint to write the data to the response writer.

Class diagram for StringViewer implementation

classDiagram
    class StringViewer {
        +MimeType() *MimeType
        +Render(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, data any) error
    }
    class MimeType {
        +Type string
        +SubType string
    }
    StringViewer ..> MimeType : uses
    note for StringViewer "Renders data as plain text"
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Added a new StringViewer struct and its associated methods.
  • Created a StringViewer struct.
  • Implemented the MimeType method to return text/plain.
  • Implemented the Render method to write the data as a string to the response writer, setting the Content-Type header.
  • Added a check for nil data to avoid writing anything to the response writer.
viewer_string.go
Added unit tests for the StringViewer.
  • Added a test case to verify that nil data is handled correctly.
  • Added a test case to verify that the StringViewer renders string data correctly, including setting the correct Content-Type header and status code.
viewer_string_test.go

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits b84c4f4..c2e6c95. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Go LogoGo✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.25%. Comparing base (b84c4f4) to head (c2e6c95).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #28      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.17%   90.25%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          34       35       +1     
  Lines        1221     1231      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         1101     1111      +10     
  Misses         83       83              
  Partials       37       37              
Flag Coverage Δ
Unit-Tests 90.25% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @cnlangzi - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

viewer_string.go Outdated
return nil
}

w.Header().Add("Content-Type", "text/plain; charset=utf-8")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion: Use Header().Set() instead of Add() for Content-Type to prevent multiple header values

Header().Add() can result in multiple Content-Type headers if one already exists. Since Content-Type should only have one value, Header().Set() would be more appropriate.

Suggested change
w.Header().Add("Content-Type", "text/plain; charset=utf-8")
w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "text/plain; charset=utf-8")

@cnlangzi cnlangzi merged commit 84b8b6b into main Jan 23, 2025
7 checks passed
@cnlangzi cnlangzi deleted the feat/string branch January 23, 2025 03:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant