-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
feat(ext): added ext/csrf
#46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR introduces a new CSRF extension that implements middleware for generating, validating, and managing CSRF tokens, including JavaScript token support. The implementation adds new middleware components, configuration options, and tests, as well as updates to the documentation. Sequence diagram for CSRF Middleware Request HandlingsequenceDiagram
actor User
participant Server
participant "CSRF Middleware" as CSRF
participant "Application Handler" as App
User->>Server: HTTP Request
Server->>CSRF: Process request
alt Request Method is GET/HEAD/OPTIONS
CSRF->>CSRF: Check for CSRF token cookie
alt Token Absent
CSRF->>Server: Set token cookie
end
CSRF->>App: Forward request
else Request Method is POST/PUT/DELETE
CSRF->>CSRF: verifyToken(token, request)
alt Token Valid
CSRF->>App: Forward request
else Token Invalid
CSRF->>Server: Respond with HTTP 418 (Teapot)
end
end
App-->>Server: Application Response
Server-->>User: HTTP Response
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @cnlangzi - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider adding an example of how to use the CSRF middleware with a form in the README.
- The
csrf.js
file should be served with aCache-Control
header to allow browsers to cache it.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 3 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟡 Testing: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #46 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.69% 93.02% +0.32%
==========================================
Files 46 49 +3
Lines 1766 1892 +126
==========================================
+ Hits 1637 1760 +123
- Misses 96 98 +2
- Partials 33 34 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Changed
Fixed
Added
ext/csrf
extensionTests
Tasks to complete before merging PR:
make unit-test
to check for any regressions 📋make lint
to check for any issuesSummary by Sourcery
New Features: