Skip to content

Editorial: improve language around conversions to JS #664

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2019

Conversation

Ms2ger
Copy link
Member

@Ms2ger Ms2ger commented Feb 27, 2019

This prose is converting IDL values to JS values, so they should not try to
convert to IDL types.

Separately, fix some grammar nits.

Fixes https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20455.


Preview | Diff

Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, that works for me, thanks!

This prose is converting IDL values to JS values, so they should not try to
convert to IDL types.

Separately, fix some grammar nits.

Fixes https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20455.
@Ms2ger Ms2ger force-pushed the 20455-conversion branch from e325ade to 5fa9b1e Compare March 4, 2019 08:33
@Ms2ger Ms2ger merged commit 8ad7c19 into master Mar 4, 2019
@Ms2ger Ms2ger deleted the 20455-conversion branch March 4, 2019 08:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants