Skip to content

do not report when linked resources are legit publication resources #1454

@rdeltour

Description

@rdeltour

The spec says:

Resources referenced from the link element are publication resources only when they are:

In all other cases (e.g., when linking to standalone [onix] or [xmp] records), the resources referenced are not publication resources (i.e., are not subject to core media type requirements) and EPUB creators MUST NOT list them in the manifest.

Currently, EPUBCheck reports OPF-067 ("The resource "…" must not be listed both as a "link" element in the package metadata and as a manifest item.") even for the two exceptions listed in the spec. For instance, spec example 33 (reference to a record embedded in an XHTML content document) is rejected by EPUBCheck.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

status: has PRThe issue is being processed in a pull requesttype: false-positiveThis issue is about valid content being incorrectly rejected

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions