-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 734
Description
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-4/#text-spacing-property
In the current draft, the normal
value is defined as:
Specifies the baseline behavior, equivalent to
space-start allow-end trim-adjacent
.
About the space-start
value in this definition, I have proposed to change it to space-first
in the following issue:
Now, I add one more suggestion: change allow-end
to trim-end
in this definition. So the normal
will be equivalent to space-first trim-end trim-adjacent
.
I summarize the reason:
trim-end
is typographically better thanallow-end
in most casestrim-end
behavior is simpler and needs less overhead thanallow-end
trim-end
is typographically better than allow-end
in most cases
In justified text, the end of lines should be aligned visually. The trim-end
is fine for this purpose, and allow-end
is not very fine because it makes punctuation at end of lines not alined visually.
Of course, there are cases where allow-end
is preferable. Traditionally, in Japanese and Chinese typesetting, a grid-like arrangement with solid setting (no inter-character spacing) is preferable. The trim-end
may add extra inter-character spacing when a fullwidth closing punctuation at end of line is trimmed to half-width. So allow-end
may be better in this case. However, this will be a less usual case in Web, where the number of characters per line is usually not fixed, and the grid-like arrangement doesn't make much sense.
trim-end
processing is simpler and needs less overhead than allow-end
To implement the default behavior (normal
), it is important that the processing needs less overhead.
The trim-end
processing is simpler, because in this mode, fullwidth closing punctuation can be treated as half-width punctuation plus half-width space which is discarded at line end as like a normal space. On the other hand, allow-end
is not so simple because processing needs to be changed depending on the position of the fullwidth closing punctuation in the line, and the processing overhead is not very small.
This is what I have found in my recent experience implementing the text-spacing property in Vivliostyle.js.
FYI, a related blog post on Vivliostyle site: Line end handling has been evolved to allow multiple typesetting options