Skip to content

getPropertyType() needs a rewrite? #456

@lukewarlow

Description

@lukewarlow

Like #423 but for getPropertyType().

Neither getPropertyType() nor getAttributeType() are actually implemented as specced they both in reality use a hardcoded "map" it would be better to spec both of these as actually implemented. This will help future implementators but also help drive the point that if a new sink is added to the spec it needs adding to these maps too.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions