Skip to content

Conversation

NickLucche
Copy link
Contributor

Copy pasting the example after changes to spec decoding conf yields:

  File "/home/nicolo/llmd/vllm/vllm/engine/arg_utils.py", line 1039, in create_speculative_config
    speculative_config = SpeculativeConfig.from_dict(
                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/nicolo/llmd/vllm/vllm/config.py", line 2543, in from_dict
    return cls(**dict_value)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/nicolo/llmd/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_dataclasses.py", line 123, in __init__
    s.__pydantic_validator__.validate_python(ArgsKwargs(args, kwargs), self_instance=s)
pydantic_core._pydantic_core.ValidationError: 1 validation error for SpeculativeConfig
  Value error, num_speculative_tokens must be provided with speculative model unless the draft model config contains an n_predict parameter. [type=value_error, input_value=ArgsKwargs((), {'model': ...sable_log_stats': True}), input_type=ArgsKwargs]

Signed-off-by: NickLucche <nlucches@redhat.com>
@NickLucche NickLucche requested a review from hmellor as a code owner July 2, 2025 13:40
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @NickLucche, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the accuracy and usability of the documentation by correcting a non-functional code example related to speculative decoding. The update ensures that users can directly copy and run the provided configuration without encountering validation errors, thereby enhancing the developer experience.

Highlights

  • Documentation Update: I've updated the EAGLE speculative decoding example in docs/features/spec_decode.md to include the num_speculative_tokens parameter within the speculative_config.
  • Bug Fix for Example: This change resolves a ValidationError that occurred when attempting to use the previous example, specifically addressing the requirement for num_speculative_tokens when a speculative model is provided.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@mergify mergify bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request fixes a broken example for EAGLE speculative decoding in the documentation. The change correctly adds the missing num_speculative_tokens parameter, which resolves the ValidationError.

I've added one suggestion to include a comment in the code example. This comment clarifies how the value for num_speculative_tokens is determined, which should be helpful for users configuring other EAGLE models in the future.

@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ an [EAGLE (Extrapolation Algorithm for Greater Language-model Efficiency)](https
speculative_config={
"model": "yuhuili/EAGLE-LLaMA3-Instruct-8B",
"draft_tensor_parallel_size": 1,
"num_speculative_tokens": 2,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This change correctly fixes the example. To improve clarity for users, it would be beneficial to add a comment explaining how the value for num_speculative_tokens is determined for EAGLE models. This will help them configure other EAGLE models correctly.

For yuhuili/EAGLE-LLaMA3-Instruct-8B, the num_heads in its config.json is 2, so this value is correct.

Suggested change
"num_speculative_tokens": 2,
# For EAGLE models, this should match the `num_heads` in the
# draft model's config.json.
"num_speculative_tokens": 2,

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 2, 2025

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

@aarnphm aarnphm enabled auto-merge (squash) July 2, 2025 15:14
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Jul 2, 2025
@simon-mo simon-mo disabled auto-merge July 3, 2025 00:13
@simon-mo simon-mo merged commit 3dd3591 into vllm-project:main Jul 3, 2025
52 of 55 checks passed
huydhn pushed a commit to huydhn/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2025
Signed-off-by: NickLucche <nlucches@redhat.com>
LyrisZhong pushed a commit to LyrisZhong/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
Signed-off-by: NickLucche <nlucches@redhat.com>
avigny pushed a commit to avigny/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
Signed-off-by: NickLucche <nlucches@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: avigny <47987522+avigny@users.noreply.github.com>
Pradyun92 pushed a commit to Pradyun92/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
Signed-off-by: NickLucche <nlucches@redhat.com>
jinzhen-lin pushed a commit to jinzhen-lin/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2025
Signed-off-by: NickLucche <nlucches@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhen Lin <linjinzhen@hotmail.com>
googlercolin pushed a commit to googlercolin/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2025
Signed-off-by: NickLucche <nlucches@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants