-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10k
[Bugfix][V1][P/D]Fix the issue of occasional garbled output for P2pNcclConnector #20263
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Abatom, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request resolves a concurrency issue in the P2pNcclConnector that leads to garbled output during stress testing. By ensuring that tensor creation occurs within the correct CUDA stream, it prevents potential race conditions and improves the reliability of distributed tensor transfers.
Highlights
- Bug Fix: Addresses an issue where garbled output occurs in the P2pNcclConnector when receiving a temporarily created empty tensor, especially under stress testing conditions.
- Concurrency: Ensures that the tensor creation happens within the context of the
recv_stream
to avoid potential synchronization issues with NCCL operations.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request addresses a critical race condition in the P2pNcclConnector
that could lead to garbled output under stress. The fix is well-targeted and correct. By ensuring that the tensor allocation (torch.empty
) and the subsequent ncclRecv
operation are both executed on the same CUDA stream, the change prevents data corruption by properly ordering the asynchronous GPU operations. This is an essential fix for the stability and correctness of the P2P KV transfer mechanism.
with torch.cuda.stream(self.recv_stream): | ||
tensor = torch.empty(data["shape"], | ||
dtype=getattr( | ||
torch, data["dtype"]), | ||
device=self.device) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change is a crucial fix that correctly addresses a potential race condition.
By placing the torch.empty
call within the recv_stream
context, you ensure that the tensor memory allocation is properly ordered with respect to the subsequent ncclRecv
call, which also uses self.recv_stream
.
Without this, the allocation would occur on the default CUDA stream. If the default stream and recv_stream
are not synchronized, the ncclRecv
operation could begin writing to the tensor's memory before the allocation is complete, leading to the data corruption and garbled output described in the pull request. This change correctly serializes these operations on the same stream, which is essential for correctness and stability under load.
…clConnector (vllm-project#20263) Signed-off-by: Abatom <abzhonghua@gmail.com>
…clConnector (vllm-project#20263) Signed-off-by: Abatom <abzhonghua@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: avigny <47987522+avigny@users.noreply.github.com>
…clConnector (vllm-project#20263) Signed-off-by: Abatom <abzhonghua@gmail.com>
Fix the issue of occasional garbled output when receiving a temporarily created empty tensor and ncclRecv are not in the same stream.
Reproduction steps