Skip to content

Conversation

mgoin
Copy link
Member

@mgoin mgoin commented Jun 27, 2025

Purpose

FIX #20198

It seems like the model definition has changed upstream this morning https://huggingface.co/MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-Text-01/commit/130e821701f3244ab18bab619dbd6fa9b5a92d28

This caused our implementation to start failing and falling back to the Transformers implementation, which doesn't work yet.

We will need to update the definition in vLLM to support the new "HF format" of MiniMaxForCausalLM, but we should do that in another PR. This one is just to pin to the older format in the meantime.

Test Plan

pytest -s -v "tests/models/test_initialization.py::test_can_initialize[MiniMaxText01ForCausalLM]"

Test Result

Local pass

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @mgoin, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request provides a temporary fix for a continuous integration (CI) failure. It addresses an issue where an upstream change to the MiniMax-Text-01 model definition caused our existing tests to break. The immediate solution is to mark this specific model as unavailable online within our test registry, thereby skipping its associated tests and unblocking CI, with a follow-up planned to properly integrate the updated model definition.

Highlights

  • CI Fix: Implemented a temporary measure to resolve continuous integration (CI) failures caused by an upstream change in the MiniMax-Text-01 model definition.
  • Test Configuration: Configured the MiniMaxText01ForCausalLM model within tests/models/registry.py to be temporarily marked as is_available_online=False, which causes its online availability tests to be skipped.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request temporarily disables a failing test for MiniMaxText01ForCausalLM to fix the CI. I've suggested adding a comment to document this temporary change, ensuring it's tracked for future resolution.

@mgoin mgoin changed the title [CI Fix] Temporarily skip MiniMaxText01ForCausalLM due to model changes [CI Fix] Pin tests/models/registry.py MiniMaxText01ForCausalLM to revision due to model changes Jun 27, 2025
Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@houseroad houseroad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing the CI.

@mgoin mgoin added bug Something isn't working ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed labels Jun 28, 2025
@ywang96
Copy link
Member

ywang96 commented Jun 28, 2025

Does this mean that this model is currently broken if users launch it with default args?

@houseroad
Copy link
Collaborator

@ywang96, good point. I may create an issue to track the breakage of the latest min-max model?

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 merged commit c329cec into vllm-project:main Jun 28, 2025
58 checks passed
@mgoin
Copy link
Member Author

mgoin commented Jun 28, 2025

I think I have a patch to support the new format, will post in a few hours

CSWYF3634076 pushed a commit to CSWYF3634076/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2025
…ision due to model changes (vllm-project#20199)

Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
avigny pushed a commit to avigny/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
…ision due to model changes (vllm-project#20199)

Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: avigny <47987522+avigny@users.noreply.github.com>
googlercolin pushed a commit to googlercolin/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2025
…ision due to model changes (vllm-project#20199)

Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[CI Failure]: Basic Models Test - test_can_initialize[MiniMaxText01ForCausalLM]
4 participants