Skip to content

Conversation

tlrmchlsmth
Copy link
Collaborator

@tlrmchlsmth tlrmchlsmth commented Jun 26, 2025

Purpose

Changes to vllm/config.py can be user-facing and have large impacts - this PR adds some codeowners

Signed-off-by: Tyler Michael Smith <tyler@neuralmagic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Michael Smith <tyler@neuralmagic.com>
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @tlrmchlsmth, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a process improvement by assigning specific codeowners to the vllm/config.py file. This change aims to enhance oversight and collaboration for modifications to this user-facing and impactful configuration file, ensuring that relevant team members are automatically notified and involved in reviews.

Highlights

  • Code Ownership: Established new code ownership rules for the critical vllm/config.py file. This ensures that any modifications to this user-facing configuration file automatically notify a designated group of maintainers and contributors for review.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@mergify mergify bot added the ci/build label Jun 26, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds several code owners to the vllm/config.py file in the .github/CODEOWNERS file. The change aims to ensure that modifications to the configuration file are reviewed by a wider audience due to their potential impact. I suggested adding more specific comments to explain the responsibilities of the code owners.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Michael Smith <tyler@neuralmagic.com>
@vllm-bot vllm-bot merged commit 0bceac9 into main Jun 26, 2025
8 of 12 checks passed
@vllm-bot vllm-bot deleted the more_spam branch June 26, 2025 15:19
gmarinho2 pushed a commit to gmarinho2/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2025
Signed-off-by: Tyler Michael Smith <tyler@neuralmagic.com>
xjpang pushed a commit to xjpang/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2025
Signed-off-by: Tyler Michael Smith <tyler@neuralmagic.com>
wseaton pushed a commit to wseaton/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2025
Signed-off-by: Tyler Michael Smith <tyler@neuralmagic.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Eaton <weaton@redhat.com>
wseaton pushed a commit to wseaton/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2025
Signed-off-by: Tyler Michael Smith <tyler@neuralmagic.com>
wwl2755-google pushed a commit to wwl2755-google/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2025
Signed-off-by: Tyler Michael Smith <tyler@neuralmagic.com>
avigny pushed a commit to avigny/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
Signed-off-by: Tyler Michael Smith <tyler@neuralmagic.com>
Signed-off-by: avigny <47987522+avigny@users.noreply.github.com>
googlercolin pushed a commit to googlercolin/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2025
Signed-off-by: Tyler Michael Smith <tyler@neuralmagic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants