[Refactor] Rename commnication utils #20091
Conversation
Signed-off-by: yewentao256 <zhyanwentao@126.com>
|
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @yewentao256, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request performs a targeted refactoring by renaming a utility module to a more generic name. This change improves the clarity and accuracy of the codebase by reflecting the module's broader applicability beyond its initial DeepEP-specific context, making it more suitable for current PPLX test usage and future communication backend integrations.
Highlights
- Refactoring: The core utility file
deepep_utils.pyhas been renamed toutils.py. This change reflects that the utilities within, such asparallel_launch, are no longer exclusive to DeepEP and are also utilized by PPLX tests, with potential for use by other communication backends in the future. - Import Path Updates: All relevant test files that previously imported from
deepep_utilshave been updated to import from the newly namedutilsmodule. This includestest_deepep_deepgemm_moe.py,test_deepep_moe.py,test_pplx_cutlass_moe.py, andtest_pplx_moe.py.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The code changes in this pull request are a straightforward refactoring to rename import paths from deepep_utils to utils. This aligns with the pull request's stated purpose of making the utility module name more generic for broader use cases beyond just DeepEP. The changes are purely mechanical and do not introduce any functional regressions, performance bottlenecks, or security vulnerabilities. No issues were found that meet the specified severity criteria (medium, high, critical).
|
This pull request has merge conflicts that must be resolved before it can be |
Signed-off-by: yewentao256 <zhyanwentao@126.com>
Signed-off-by: yewentao256 <zhyanwentao@126.com> Signed-off-by: Will Eaton <weaton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: yewentao256 <zhyanwentao@126.com>
Signed-off-by: yewentao256 <zhyanwentao@126.com>
Signed-off-by: yewentao256 <zhyanwentao@126.com> Signed-off-by: avigny <47987522+avigny@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: yewentao256 <zhyanwentao@126.com>
Purpose
Currently, PPLX tests also uses the
parallel_launchfrom utils.py, not only for deepep, and we may introduces other communication backend in the future.So I rename the
deepep_utils.pytoutils.pyto avoid confusion.