Skip to content

Conversation

LucasWilkinson
Copy link
Collaborator

@LucasWilkinson LucasWilkinson commented Jun 25, 2025

Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist

  • The purpose of the PR, such as "Fix some issue (link existing issues this PR will resolve)".
  • The test plan, such as providing test command.
  • The test results, such as pasting the results comparison before and after, or e2e results
  • (Optional) The necessary documentation update, such as updating supported_models.md and examples for a new model.

Purpose

Fix a sporadic illegal memory access discovered by @WoosukKwon

Test Plan

lm-eval + @WoosukKwon repro attempt

Test Result

after 1.5h @WoosukKwon has yet to repo

lm_eval   --model vllm   --model_args '{"pretrained":"Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct","tensor_parallel_size":8,"compilation_config":{"full_cuda_graph":true}}'   --tasks gsm8k   --batch_size auto
...
|Tasks|Version|     Filter     |n-shot|  Metric   |   |Value |   |Stderr|
|-----|------:|----------------|-----:|-----------|---|-----:|---|-----:|
|gsm8k|      3|flexible-extract|     5|exact_match|↑  |0.5277|±  |0.0138|
|     |       |strict-match    |     5|exact_match|↑  |0.5353|±  |0.0137|
lm_eval   --model vllm   --model_args '{"pretrained":"Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct","tensor_parallel_size":8,"compilation_config":{"full_cuda_graph":false}}'   --tasks gsm8k   --batch_size auto
...
|Tasks|Version|     Filter     |n-shot|  Metric   |   |Value |   |Stderr|
|-----|------:|----------------|-----:|-----------|---|-----:|---|-----:|
|gsm8k|      3|flexible-extract|     5|exact_match|↑  |0.5292|±  |0.0137|
|     |       |strict-match    |     5|exact_match|↑  |0.5406|±  |0.0137|

(Optional) Documentation Update

Signed-off-by: Lucas Wilkinson <lwilkins@redhat.com>
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @LucasWilkinson, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request implements a critical bug fix for a sporadic illegal memory access encountered in FlashAttention 3 when operating with full CUDA graphs. The solution involves a targeted adjustment to the attention backend's initialization logic, specifically by disabling AOT scheduling when full CUDA graph mode is active, thereby resolving the underlying memory issue.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: Illegal Memory Access: This pull request addresses and fixes a sporadic illegal memory access issue that occurred when using FlashAttention 3 (FA3) with full CUDA graphs enabled.
  • Configuration Logic Adjustment: The previous validation logic that raised a ValueError if full CUDA graph mode was enabled without AOT (Ahead-of-Time) scheduling has been removed. Instead, when full CUDA graph is active, AOT scheduling is now explicitly disabled (self.aot_schedule = False) to prevent the reported memory access error.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@mergify mergify bot added the v1 label Jun 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses a sporadic illegal memory access by modifying the logic for full_cuda_graph and aot_schedule. The change correctly disables AOT scheduling when full CUDA graph is enabled, which resolves the immediate issue. However, this new behavior directly contradicts a previous requirement stated in the removed code, indicating a need to review and update any related documentation or code that might still reflect the old, inconsistent requirement.

Comment on lines +161 to +167
if self.use_full_cuda_graph:
# NOTE(lucas): AOT scheduling not supported in full cuda graph mode
# yet. This is because the scheduler and kernel need to always use
# the same num_splits (which acts as an upper bound with the
# dynamic split scheduler) which is currently heuristically decided
# by the kernel launching code.
self.aot_schedule = False
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The previous logic (lines 161-163 removed) stated that "Full CUDA graph mode requires AOT scheduling". However, the new code (lines 161-167 added) explicitly sets self.aot_schedule = False when self.use_full_cuda_graph is enabled. This is a direct contradiction of the previous requirement.

While the new comment clarifies that "AOT scheduling not supported in full cuda graph mode yet", it's important to ensure that any other parts of the codebase or documentation that refer to full_cuda_graph requiring aot_schedule are updated to reflect this change. The previous ValueError message was misleading given the current state of support.

Signed-off-by: Lucas Wilkinson <lwilkins@redhat.com>
@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Jun 25, 2025
@WoosukKwon
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks so much!

@aarnphm aarnphm enabled auto-merge (squash) June 25, 2025 06:24
@aarnphm aarnphm merged commit 0f9e735 into vllm-project:main Jun 25, 2025
82 checks passed
gmarinho2 pushed a commit to gmarinho2/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2025
xjpang pushed a commit to xjpang/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2025
…ct#20057)

Signed-off-by: Lucas Wilkinson <lwilkins@redhat.com>
wseaton pushed a commit to wseaton/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2025
…ct#20057)

Signed-off-by: Lucas Wilkinson <lwilkins@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Eaton <weaton@redhat.com>
wseaton pushed a commit to wseaton/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2025
…ct#20057)

Signed-off-by: Lucas Wilkinson <lwilkins@redhat.com>
wwl2755-google pushed a commit to wwl2755-google/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2025
avigny pushed a commit to avigny/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
…ct#20057)

Signed-off-by: Lucas Wilkinson <lwilkins@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: avigny <47987522+avigny@users.noreply.github.com>
googlercolin pushed a commit to googlercolin/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed v1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants