Skip to content

Conversation

amitm02
Copy link
Contributor

@amitm02 amitm02 commented Jun 24, 2025

The previously merged PR #19057 failed to disable the exception when --scheduling-policy was defined while running V1.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @amitm02, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a lingering issue where the --scheduling-policy flag would still trigger an unsupported feature exception when used with the V1 engine, despite a previous attempt to disable this behavior. The change ensures that the V1 engine now correctly bypasses this specific compatibility check.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: Correctly disables the exception for the --scheduling-policy flag when running with the V1 engine, addressing an oversight from a previous pull request.
  • Code Removal: Removes a specific conditional check within the _is_v1_supported_oracle method that was erroneously raising an exception if self.scheduling_policy differed from SchedulerConfig.policy.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The code changes remove a check for the --scheduling-policy flag when running V1. Ensure that this removal does not introduce any regressions or unintended behavior, and that the functionality related to scheduling policy is still correctly handled or no longer relevant in the V1 engine.

…ity in V1

Signed-off-by: amit <amit.man@gmail.com>
@mergify mergify bot added the v1 label Jun 24, 2025
@aarnphm aarnphm added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Jun 24, 2025
@aarnphm aarnphm changed the title Remove --scheduling-policy is not supported by the V1 Engine exception [Fix][V1] Remove --scheduling-policy oracle Jun 24, 2025
@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon merged commit 981eeca into vllm-project:main Jun 24, 2025
81 of 82 checks passed
gmarinho2 pushed a commit to gmarinho2/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2025
xjpang pushed a commit to xjpang/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2025
wseaton pushed a commit to wseaton/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2025
Signed-off-by: amit <amit.man@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Eaton <weaton@redhat.com>
wseaton pushed a commit to wseaton/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2025
wwl2755-google pushed a commit to wwl2755-google/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2025
avigny pushed a commit to avigny/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
Signed-off-by: amit <amit.man@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: avigny <47987522+avigny@users.noreply.github.com>
googlercolin pushed a commit to googlercolin/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed v1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants