suggestion: clea(n|r)er for loop syntax instead of classic C style one #5944
Description
I feel a for loop with the following syntax:
for i in [1..30] 2 {
println(i)
}
-
looks cleaner
-
is more readable
-
involves less typing
than the archaic C-style for loop.
few more examples:
// counter decrement
for i in [44..22] -2 {
println(i)
}
// step omitted
for i in [1..100] {
println(i)
}
// side-by-side
for i in [1..30] 2 {
println(i)
}
for i := 1; i < 30; i += 2 {
println(i)
}
// it took me 24 minutes just to type the above loop