Skip to content

Conversation

aduth
Copy link
Contributor

@aduth aduth commented Nov 1, 2024

Summary

Reduced the JavaScript bundle size. By optimizing the implementation of core component code, overall JavaScript sizes are reduced.

Breaking change

This is not a breaking change.

Related pull requests

Split from #5793, to simplify review.

Includes additional inline code comments based on review feedback from that pull request.

Preview link

N/A

Problem statement

See #5793

Solution

Replace use of receptor/keymap with equivalent custom implementation.

Testing and review

Verify unit tests pass:

npx gulp unitTests

For user acceptance testing, Modal is a good component to test for regressions, since its focus trap includes both simple key mapping (Tab) as well as modifier combinations (Shift+Tab).

  1. Go to http://localhost:6006/?path=/story/components-modal--default
  2. Click "Open default modal"
  3. Press Tab or Shift+Tab
  4. Observe that modal focus wraps as expected in focus trap

Copy link
Contributor

@mahoneycm mahoneycm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems to be working great @aduth ! The simple replacement in each of the component JS files is a good sign.

I left a few comments for added clarity. Some of the unit test descriptions were confusing to me. I added some suggestions but let me know if I'm off base. Hopefully we can improve their readability a bit so users can understand easily.

Open to other suggestions as well!

@aduth aduth requested a review from a team as a code owner January 10, 2025 19:48
@aduth aduth force-pushed the aduth-rm-receptor-keymap branch from 4167c08 to eebd3f8 Compare January 10, 2025 19:59
@mejiaj mejiaj changed the base branch from develop to replace-receptor January 14, 2025 14:12
@mejiaj mejiaj requested a review from mahoneycm February 4, 2025 16:36
@mejiaj
Copy link
Contributor

mejiaj commented Feb 4, 2025

@mahoneycm re-requesting review to confirm your comments have been addressed.

@aduth aduth force-pushed the aduth-rm-receptor-keymap branch from eebd3f8 to 4539fd0 Compare February 4, 2025 16:42
@aduth aduth changed the base branch from replace-receptor to develop February 4, 2025 16:43
@mahoneycm
Copy link
Contributor

@aduth I left one more suggestion for the direction of the test descriptions! Apologies for not getting back to you sooner.

Thank you for your continued support and input 🙏

Co-authored-by: Charlie Mahoney <charlie.mahoney@bixal.com>
@aduth
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduth commented Feb 6, 2025

@mahoneycm Thanks for the re-review. I applied the latest suggestions from the review threads. Let me know if there are others you'd still like to see updated from the unresolved threads.

@dct2023
Copy link

dct2023 commented Feb 7, 2025

@mlloydbixal Adding you as a reviewer for this to get us unblocked on #6291

Copy link
Contributor

@mahoneycm mahoneycm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aduth Ok last batch of suggestions to make the existing tests match the new convention and to remove a duplicate test for unexpected modifiers in keypress!

After this we should be good to go

aduth and others added 2 commits February 10, 2025 11:52
@aduth
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduth commented Feb 10, 2025

@aduth Ok last batch of suggestions to make the existing tests match the new convention and to remove a duplicate test for unexpected modifiers in keypress!

Thanks for the review. Pushed updates in d0840da and a0ab5a1 based on your feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@mahoneycm mahoneycm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks so much @aduth 👍

@mahoneycm mahoneycm requested review from mejiaj, amyleadem and mandylloyd and removed request for a team February 11, 2025 15:41
@heymatthenry heymatthenry merged commit cdd9212 into uswds:develop Jun 9, 2025
3 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress to Fed Final Review in USWDS Core Project Data Jun 9, 2025
@heymatthenry heymatthenry mentioned this pull request Jun 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Fed Final Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants