@dearchap Are you up for addressing the conflicts and getting the test coverage above the threshold? No worries if not. I'm happy to take this work to completion.

@meatballhat Let me take a look

@meatballhat Done. Can you take a look ?

@meatballhat Can you take a look at why tests are failing ? I dont quite understand why.

@dearchap looks like tests are happy now -- coverage thresholds are still grumpy, but I don't want to be draconian about those checks. Maybe add some coverage threshold wiggle room as part of this PR? e.g.:

# in .github/codecov.yml
coverage:
  threshold: 5%

@meatballhat I update the coverage threshold but it still fails. Can you approve and merge ?

@meatballhat Can you take a look at why tests are failing ? I dont quite understand why.

@dearchap codecov will use the coverage from the base commit. Checks show target coverage need 83.22. You can try this specify a target.
Would 5% be too low? I feel more coverage can reduce review time.