feat: add runtime fallback and webcontainer support #40
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 5171e16 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@JounQin has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughA new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant UserApp
participant fallback
participant FS
participant Env
participant ChildProcess
UserApp->>fallback: call fallback(packageJsonPath, checkVersion?)
fallback->>FS: read package.json
fallback->>Env: check if webcontainer
alt In webcontainer
fallback->>FS: check WASI binding presence
alt WASI binding missing
fallback->>FS: clean/create temp dir
fallback->>ChildProcess: run pnpm install for WASI binding
end
fallback->>UserApp: require and return WASI binding
else Not in webcontainer
fallback->>Env: detect package manager
alt Supported package manager
fallback->>ChildProcess: run napi-postinstall
fallback->>Env: set SKIP_*_FALLBACK env variable
fallback->>FS: clear require cache
fallback->>UserApp: require and return package
else
fallback->>UserApp: throw error (unsupported manager)
end
end
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences |
1 similar comment
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR introduces a runtime fallback mechanism for N-API packages, adds support for WebContainer environments, and updates related tests and documentation.
- Implement
fallbackfunction with WebContainer and generic package-manager fallback insrc/fallback.ts - Add tests for fallback behavior in
test/fallback.spec.ts - Update exports, type‐only imports, and README to expose and document the new fallback entry point
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 7 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| test/fallback.spec.ts | Add tests for normal and WebContainer fallback flows |
| src/target.ts | Switch some imports to import type for cleaner TS |
| src/helpers.ts | Convert imports to type‐only |
| src/fallback.ts | New fallback logic for WebContainer and CLI fallback |
| src/constants.ts | Convert import to type‐only |
| package.json | Export fallback entry under "./fallback" |
| README.md | Document fallback API and provide usage examples |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)
src/fallback.ts:53
- There’s no test covering the version-mismatch branch when
checkVersionis true; consider adding a spec that triggers this error path.
if (checkVersion && pkgVersion !== version) {
src/fallback.ts:34
- [nitpick] The JSDoc summary only mentions WebContainer and Docker; it could also briefly describe the general package-manager fallback behavior.
* Fallback for webcontainer and docker environments like
📊 Package size report 13%↑
Unchanged files
🤖 This report was automatically generated by pkg-size-action |
size-limit report 📦
|
commit: |
|
Deploy preview for napi-postinstall ready! ✅ Preview Built with commit 5171e16. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed everything up to 494c8e3 in 2 minutes and 9 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
273lines of code in7files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. test/fallback.spec.ts:19
- Draft comment:
Directly assigning 'process.versions.webcontainer' may not work in all Node versions; consider using Object.defineProperty in tests for better reliability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% This is a test file, not production code. The current approach works fine for testing - we set the value and clean it up in afterEach. While Object.defineProperty might be more robust, this level of perfectionism in test code seems unnecessary. The current code is simple and clear. The comment does raise a valid point about Node.js version compatibility. Some versions might have process.versions as read-only. However, if this was actually a problem, the tests would fail. Since this is test code and there's a cleanup step, the simpler approach is fine. Delete the comment. The current code is sufficiently clear and functional for test purposes, and the suggested change adds unnecessary complexity.
2. src/fallback.ts:38
- Draft comment:
Typo: In the JSDoc comment, "Wether" should be "Whether". - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
3. src/fallback.ts:67
- Draft comment:
Typographical error in the error message: "target is not unavailable" should likely be "target is unavailable". - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
Workflow ID: wflow_JdCwa0xg5JqJuK9a
You can customize 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test/fallback.spec.ts (1)
6-9: Consider using undefined assignment instead of delete operator.While the performance impact in test cleanup is negligible, using undefined assignment is cleaner and avoids the static analysis warning.
afterEach(() => { - delete process.env.SKIP_UNRS_RESOLVER_FALLBACK - delete process.versions.webcontainer + process.env.SKIP_UNRS_RESOLVER_FALLBACK = undefined + process.versions.webcontainer = undefined })
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
README.md(2 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/constants.ts(1 hunks)src/fallback.ts(1 hunks)src/helpers.ts(1 hunks)src/target.ts(1 hunks)test/fallback.spec.ts(1 hunks)tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: un-ts/napi-postinstall#3
File: test/basic.spec.ts:10-14
Timestamp: 2025-04-19T17:37:36.119Z
Learning: JounQin prefers using `resolves.not.toThrow()` for testing Promise<void> functions to verify successful resolution, rather than explicitly checking for `undefined` with `resolves.toBeUndefined()`.
test/fallback.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: un-ts/napi-postinstall#3
File: test/basic.spec.ts:10-14
Timestamp: 2025-04-19T17:37:36.119Z
Learning: JounQin prefers using `resolves.not.toThrow()` for testing Promise<void> functions to verify successful resolution, rather than explicitly checking for `undefined` with `resolves.toBeUndefined()`.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/fallback.ts (3)
src/types.ts (1)
PackageJson(28-33)src/helpers.ts (2)
getNapiInfoFromPackageJson(51-109)errorMessage(280-282)src/constants.ts (1)
WASM32_WASI(17-17)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
test/fallback.spec.ts
[error] 7-7: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 8-8: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 18 on windows-latest
src/fallback.ts
[failure] 89-89: test/fallback.spec.ts > fallback > should support webcontainer
Error: spawnSync pnpm ENOENT
❯ fallback src/fallback.ts:89:19
❯ test/fallback.spec.ts:20:22
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Serialized Error: { errno: -4058, code: 'ENOENT', syscall: 'spawnSync pnpm', path: 'pnpm', spawnargs: [ 'i', '@unrs/resolver-binding-wasm32-wasi@1.9.2' ], error: { stack: 'Error: spawnSync pnpm ENOENT\n at Object.spawnSync (node:internal/child_process:1117:20)\n at spawnSync (node:child_process:876:24)\n at execFileSync (node:child_process:919:15)\n at fallback (D:\a\napi-postinstall\napi-postinstall\src\fallback.ts:89:19)\n at D:\a\napi-postinstall\napi-postinstall\test\fallback.spec.ts:20:22\n at file:///D:/a/napi-postinstall/napi-postinstall/node_modules/@vitest/runner/dist/chunk-hooks.js:155:11\n at file:///D:/a/napi-postinstall/napi-postinstall/node_modules/@vitest/runner/dist/chunk-hooks.js:752:26\n at file:///D:/a/napi-postinstall/napi-postinstall/node_modules/@vitest/runner/dist/chunk-hooks.js:1897:20\n at new Promise ()\n at runWithTimeout (file:///D:/a/napi-postinstall/napi-postinstall/node_modules/@vitest/runner/dist/chunk-hooks.js:1863:10)', message: 'spawnSync pnpm ENOENT', errno: -4058, code: 'ENOENT', syscall: 'spawnSync pnpm', path: 'pnpm', spawnargs: [ 'i', '@unrs/resolver-binding-wasm32-wasi@1.9.2' ], error: [Circular], status: null, signal: null, output: null, pid: +0, stdout: null, stderr: null, constructor: 'Function', name: 'Error', toString: 'Function', stacks: [ { method: 'fallback', file: 'D:/a/napi-postinstall/napi-postinstall/src/fallback.ts', line: 89, column: 19 }, { method: '', file: 'D:/a/napi-postinstall/napi-postinstall/test/fallback.spec.ts', line: 20, column: 22 } ] }, status: null, signal: null, output: null, pid: +0, stdout: null, stderr: null }
[failure] 122-122: test/fallback.spec.ts > fallback > should resolve napi package successfully and set skip env after processing
Error: spawnSync yarn ENOENT
❯ fallback src/fallback.ts:122:15
❯ test/fallback.spec.ts:12:12
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
Serialized Error: { errno: -4058, code: 'ENOENT', syscall: 'spawnSync yarn', path: 'yarn', spawnargs: [ 'napi-postinstall', 'unrs-resolver', '1.9.2', '0' ], error: { stack: 'Error: spawnSync yarn ENOENT\n at Object.spawnSync (node:internal/child_process:1117:20)\n at spawnSync (node:child_process:876:24)\n at execFileSync (node:child_process:919:15)\n at fallback (D:\a\napi-postinstall\napi-postinstall\src\fallback.ts:122:15)\n at D:\a\napi-postinstall\napi-postinstall\test\fallback.spec.ts:12:12\n at file:///D:/a/napi-postinstall/napi-postinstall/node_modules/@vitest/runner/dist/chunk-hooks.js:155:11\n at file:///D:/a/napi-postinstall/napi-postinstall/node_modules/@vitest/runner/dist/chunk-hooks.js:752:26\n at file:///D:/a/napi-postinstall/napi-postinstall/node_modules/@vitest/runner/dist/chunk-hooks.js:1897:20\n at new Promise ()\n at runWithTimeout (file:///D:/a/napi-postinstall/napi-postinstall/node_modules/@vitest/runner/dist/chunk-hooks.js:1863:10)', message: 'spawnSync yarn ENOENT', errno: -4058, code: 'ENOENT', syscall: 'spawnSync yarn', path: 'yarn', spawnargs: [ 'napi-postinstall', 'unrs-resolver', '1.9.2', '0' ], error: [Circular], status: null, signal: null, output: null, pid: +0, stdout: null, stderr: null, constructor: 'Function', name: 'Error', toString: 'Function', stacks: [ { method: 'fallback', file: 'D:/a/napi-postinstall/napi-postinstall/src/fallback.ts', line: 122, column: 15 }, { method: '', file: 'D:/a/napi-postinstall/napi-postinstall/test/fallback.spec.ts', line: 12, column: 12 } ] }, status: null, signal: null, output: null, pid: +0, stdout: null, stderr: null }
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: publish
- GitHub Check: deploy
- GitHub Check: size-limit
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 24 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 24 on ubuntu-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 on ubuntu-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 24 on macos-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 20 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 18 on macos-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 on macos-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 20 on macos-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 18 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 24 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 20 on windows-latest
🔇 Additional comments (13)
src/target.ts (1)
3-5: 👍 Switched toimport type– good callClear separation of type-only imports reduces emitted JS and prevents accidental circular requires.
src/constants.ts (1)
3-4: 👍 Type-only import keeps runtime cleanSame benefit here – nothing else to flag.
src/helpers.ts (1)
7-8: 👍 Consistentimport typeusageKeeps the helpers free of dead runtime
requires.tsconfig.json (1)
8-10: Path alias verification complete
- ✅ Confirmed
src/fallback.tsexists and will be compiled intolib/fallback.{js,d.ts}
No further action needed; the"napi-postinstall/fallback"alias resolves correctly.package.json (1)
22-25: Ensure build outputs match the new exportThe export maps to
./lib/fallback.{js,d.ts}. Iffallback.tsisn’t compiled (e.g. left out of thetsc -bproject) consumers will hitMODULE_NOT_FOUND. Double-check that the build pipeline copies/compiles the file intolib/before publishing.test/fallback.spec.ts (2)
11-16: LGTM!The test correctly validates the fallback function behavior and environment variable setting.
18-25: Test implementation looks good.The test correctly simulates a webcontainer environment and validates the expected behavior. Note that pipeline failures indicate this test requires
pnpmto be available in the test environment.README.md (2)
79-96: Documentation accurately reflects the new API.The TypeScript declarations and export pattern correctly document the fallback function signature.
101-113: Clear and helpful usage examples.The examples effectively demonstrate both the main module usage and the new fallback functionality with appropriate comments.
src/fallback.ts (4)
10-16: Executor mapping looks correct.The mapping appropriately handles common package managers, with special handling for Deno's npm compatibility layer.
18-31: Helper function implementation is solid.The function correctly handles both function-based and string/array-based executors.
127-134: Post-processing logic is well implemented.The environment variable naming convention and require cache clearing ensure proper fallback behavior.
98-125: Package manager execution is cross-platform compatibleNode’s
execFileSyncautomatically resolves.cmd/.exeon Windows, and yourEXECUTORSmap coversnpm,pnpm,yarn,bun, anddeno. The detection vianpm_config_user_agentplus the fallback to'npm'will work on all major platforms without changes here.– execFileSync handles Windows extensions
–EXECUTORSincludes Yarn (resolved toyarn.cmdon Windows)
– No adjustments needed insrc/fallback.tsfor cross-platform support
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #40 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 34.52% 40.98% +6.46%
==========================================
Files 6 7 +1
Lines 588 688 +100
Branches 59 67 +8
==========================================
+ Hits 203 282 +79
- Misses 385 406 +21 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 2a33fc0 in 2 minutes and 12 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
299lines of code in9files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. src/fallback.ts:80
- Draft comment:
Using fs.rmSync may break on older Node versions; ensure compatibility or provide a fallback (e.g. fs.rmdirSync with recursive) for Node versions below v14. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The code is in a new file, so we can set version requirements. The code is using modern Node.js features like node: imports which already requires Node.js 14+. The package is also using TypeScript and seems modern. The comment suggests a workaround but it's likely unnecessary given the apparent modern Node.js requirements. I might be wrong about the Node.js version requirements. There could be users trying to run this on older Node versions. The use of node: protocol imports on L1-4 is a strong signal this code requires Node 14+. Adding backwards compatibility would add complexity for likely no benefit. Delete the comment since the code already has implicit Node 14+ requirements through its use of node: imports.
2. src/fallback.ts:128
- Draft comment:
Verify that require.resolve(pkgDir) yields the intended module; using the package directory for cache deletion might be ambiguous. Consider using the package.json path instead for clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
3. test/fallback.spec.ts:7
- Draft comment:
Directly modifying process.versions (and deleting properties on it) is non-standard; consider using proper mocks to simulate the webcontainer environment. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While directly modifying process.versions is unconventional, this is a test file and the modification is cleaned up in afterEach. The test is specifically testing webcontainer behavior and needs to simulate that environment. Using mocks might be cleaner but the current approach works and is contained within tests. The comment raises a valid point about test best practices. Direct modification of process objects could lead to test pollution or unexpected behavior. However, this is an isolated test case with proper cleanup, and the current approach is simple and functional. The suggested change would add complexity without clear benefits. The comment should be deleted as it suggests a style preference rather than a necessary change, and the current implementation is acceptable for testing purposes.
4. test/fallback.spec.ts:19
- Draft comment:
This test branch may trigger an actual package installation via execFileSync. Consider mocking filesystem and child process calls to isolate tests. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is speculative - it says "may trigger" installation, but doesn't show clear evidence that it actually does. The test appears to be testing the fallback functionality which likely needs to interact with real packages. Mocking could make the test less valuable by not testing real behavior. Without seeing the implementation of 'fallback', we can't be certain if execFileSync is even used. I might be underestimating the importance of test isolation. Real filesystem/process operations could make tests slower and less reliable. While test isolation is important, we don't have strong evidence that this test actually performs problematic operations, and mocking could hide real issues we want to catch. Delete the comment as it's speculative ("may trigger") and we don't have strong evidence that mocking is necessary or beneficial here.
Workflow ID: wflow_iwZu0vl70vKjOnlI
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test/fallback.spec.ts (1)
1-3: Prefer ES-module style imports to preserve type information
import = require()erases generics (e.g. onfallback). WithesModuleInteropenabled you can keep full typings and align with the rest of the codebase:-import unrsResolver = require('unrs-resolver') -import fallback = require('napi-postinstall/fallback') +import unrsResolver from 'unrs-resolver' +import fallback from 'napi-postinstall/fallback'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
.changeset/wet-hounds-sneeze.md(1 hunks).github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks)README.md(2 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/constants.ts(1 hunks)src/fallback.ts(1 hunks)src/helpers.ts(1 hunks)src/target.ts(1 hunks)test/fallback.spec.ts(1 hunks)tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- .changeset/wet-hounds-sneeze.md
- src/target.ts
- src/helpers.ts
- .github/workflows/ci.yml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- src/constants.ts
- tsconfig.json
- package.json
- README.md
- src/fallback.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: un-ts/napi-postinstall#3
File: test/basic.spec.ts:10-14
Timestamp: 2025-04-19T17:37:36.119Z
Learning: JounQin prefers using `resolves.not.toThrow()` for testing Promise<void> functions to verify successful resolution, rather than explicitly checking for `undefined` with `resolves.toBeUndefined()`.
test/fallback.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: un-ts/napi-postinstall#3
File: test/basic.spec.ts:10-14
Timestamp: 2025-04-19T17:37:36.119Z
Learning: JounQin prefers using `resolves.not.toThrow()` for testing Promise<void> functions to verify successful resolution, rather than explicitly checking for `undefined` with `resolves.toBeUndefined()`.
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
test/fallback.spec.ts
[error] 7-7: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 8-8: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed f5c0584 in 53 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
296lines of code in9files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:41
- Draft comment:
Global installation of 'pnpm' is added here. Ensure this aligns with environments that may already have pnpm or restrict global installs. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. src/fallback.ts:89
- Draft comment:
Using execFileSync('pnpm', …) assumes a global pnpm is available. Consider adding error handling or fallback logic if 'pnpm' is not found. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
3. src/fallback.ts:128
- Draft comment:
Cache invalidation with delete require.cache[...] using require.resolve(pkgDir) might not clear all submodules. Confirm this meets your intended reload behavior. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
4. README.md:90
- Draft comment:
The new fallback API example is clear; ensure that the declared TypeScript signature matches the CommonJS export behavior. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_LeE17pumHNToO1TN
You can customize
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed d135cf6 in 1 minute and 46 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
296lines of code in9files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
7draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:39
- Draft comment:
Global install of pnpm ensures its availability in CI. Verify that this version is compatible with project requirements. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. README.md:90
- Draft comment:
Document that the fallback function is synchronous and blocking, so users know its runtime implications. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
3. package.json:22
- Draft comment:
Fallback module export has been correctly added. Ensure the paths to generated type and JS files are valid. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
4. src/fallback.ts:61
- Draft comment:
The use of 'process.versions.webcontainer' to detect WebContainer environments is acceptable but may be fragile; ensure all target environments set this flag appropriately. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
5. src/fallback.ts:89
- Draft comment:
Direct use of 'pnpm' via execFileSync assumes it's globally available. Consider adding error handling if pnpm is missing or version is incompatible. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment initially seems reasonable, but looking deeper: 1) This code only runs in webcontainer environments 2) Webcontainers typically have pnpm pre-installed 3) The non-webcontainer path already handles package manager selection properly through userAgent detection and EXECUTORS mapping 4) If pnpm fails, execFileSync will throw an error naturally which will bubble up. I might be making assumptions about webcontainer environments always having pnpm. Also, execFileSync's error might not be as user-friendly as a custom error. While those are valid concerns, the code is specifically for webcontainer environments where pnpm is standard, and the existing error handling through execFileSync is sufficient for this use case. The comment should be deleted as it raises concerns about a non-issue - pnpm usage here is intentional and appropriately scoped to webcontainer environments.
6. src/fallback.ts:128
- Draft comment:
Clearing the require cache ensures a fresh module load but may have side effects. Confirm this behavior aligns with the intended fallback mechanism. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
7. test/fallback.spec.ts:19
- Draft comment:
The webcontainer test triggers a pnpm install via execFileSync. Consider mocking or stubbing this call to avoid side effects and network dependency during tests. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment makes claims about implementation details (pnpm install, execFileSync) that aren't visible in the diff or file. Without seeing the implementation of fallback(), I can't verify if this claim is true. The test looks like a standard unit test with no obvious side effects. The comment could be correct - maybe the fallback() function does make system calls that should be mocked. I don't have enough context to definitively say it's wrong. However, per the rules, I should delete comments unless there is STRONG EVIDENCE they are correct. The implementation details mentioned aren't visible in this code. Delete this comment since it makes claims about implementation details that aren't visible in the changed code, and we don't have strong evidence it's correct.
Workflow ID: wflow_rhPC9BbnRGzO59xx
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed ea9bf46 in 1 minute and 38 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
299lines of code in9files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
6draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:39
- Draft comment:
Global install of pnpm is added here. Consider pinning/caching the pnpm version to avoid possible version mismatches. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. README.md:90
- Draft comment:
The fallback usage example is clear. Consider adding a brief note explaining how behavior differs between webcontainer and non‑webcontainer environments. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. src/fallback.ts:89
- Draft comment:
The webcontainer branch invokes 'pnpm' via execFileSync. Ensure that pnpm is reliably available in these environments and consider adding error handling or a clearer error message if not. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The comment raises a valid concern about error handling, but there are several issues: 1) It's speculative - we don't know if pnpm availability is actually a problem in webcontainers 2) execFileSync already throws errors that would be caught by the environment 3) The code already has error messages for other cases 4) This is infrastructure code that likely has its own error handling I might be underestimating the importance of explicit error handling. Missing pnpm could cause confusing errors. While explicit error handling could be nice, the comment is too speculative without evidence that this is a real issue in webcontainers. The existing error handling is likely sufficient. Delete the comment as it's speculative and asks for verification without strong evidence that missing error handling is actually a problem.
4. src/fallback.ts:130
- Draft comment:
After running execFileSync in the non‑webcontainer branch, the require cache is cleared via require.resolve(pkgDir). Verify that pkgDir reliably resolves to the module's entry point in all cases. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
5. src/fallback.ts:98
- Draft comment:
Defaulting to 'npm' when npm_config_user_agent is missing is reasonable. Ensure that this fallback covers all expected package managers or update EXECUTORS accordingly if needed. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
6. test/fallback.spec.ts:10
- Draft comment:
The test resets process.env and process.versions.webcontainer in afterEach. Consider checking for any temporary file cleanup in the webcontainer branch to avoid side effects. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_gt2q5q70s28Vc4UY
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 5171e16 in 1 minute and 16 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
21lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. test/fallback.spec.ts:8
- Draft comment:
Clarify why tests are skipped for Windows; ensure that 'skipIf' is supported in your test framework for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
2. test/fallback.spec.ts:25
- Draft comment:
Add an inline comment for the boolean 'true' argument to explain its role in enabling webcontainer fallback behavior. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The boolean parameter's purpose is somewhat unclear from context alone. However, the test case name 'should support webcontainer' and the setting of process.versions.webcontainer right before the call provides decent context. The suggestion to add an inline comment is more about documentation preference than a required code change. The comment might be helpful for future maintainers who are unfamiliar with the codebase. Not having parameter documentation could make the code harder to understand. While documentation is good, this is a test file where the context is clear from the test name and setup. The comment is more of a style suggestion than a necessary code change. Delete the comment as it violates the rule about not making purely informative comments. The test context already makes the parameter's purpose clear enough.
Workflow ID: wflow_SFfHdoYDXeczndIW
You can customize
close #35
Important
Add
fallbackfunction for package loading in constrained environments, update documentation, tests, and CI workflow.fallbackfunction insrc/fallback.tsfor package loading in constrained environments.fallbackmodule inpackage.json.README.mdwith TypeScript declarations and usage examples forfallback.test/fallback.spec.tsto testfallbackfunctionality.ci.ymlto include pnpm setup.src/constants.ts,src/helpers.ts, andsrc/target.ts.This description was created by
for 5171e16. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
fallbackfunction for enhanced package loading in constrained environments.fallbackmodule.Documentation
fallbackfunction.Tests
fallbackfunctionality.Style
Chores