Skip to content

Conversation

lrq3000
Copy link
Member

@lrq3000 lrq3000 commented Sep 17, 2016

Modularize tqdm.pandas() back to tqdm_pandas submodule for these reasons:

  • Uses external library (plus it's still in alpha stages, not stable, bad for core tqdm)
  • In core tqdm, this decreased the coverage in Travis.
  • Standardize usage with submodules with delayed interface such as tqdm_notebook (see tqdm_notebook for pandas #245).

Don't worry about codecov's test not passing the threshold, see #272 for more info on this issue.

Signed-off-by: Stephen L. <lrq3000@gmail.com>
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Sep 17, 2016

Current coverage is 91.02% (diff: 6.97%)

Merging #271 into master will increase coverage by 0.62%

@@             master       #271   diff @@
==========================================
  Files             7          7          
  Lines           479        479          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches         86         85     -1   
==========================================
+ Hits            433        436     +3   
+ Misses           44         41     -3   
  Partials          2          2          

Powered by Codecov. Last update bc9d113...4281e9d

@lrq3000 lrq3000 added to-review 🔍 Awaiting final confirmation submodule ⊂ Periphery/subclasses labels Sep 17, 2016
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 91.441% when pulling caf6d44 on modularize-pandas into bc9d113 on master.

@lrq3000
Copy link
Member Author

lrq3000 commented Sep 17, 2016

Seems like coveralls is still not disabled. I don't know who owns the coveralls tqdm account, but please disable notifications as per lemurheavy/coveralls-public#93 because I can't find any other way to disable (@casperdcl?).

/EDIT: fixed, I disabled coveralls comments.

Signed-off-by: Stephen L. <lrq3000@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen L. <lrq3000@gmail.com>
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 17, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 91.441% when pulling 4281e9d on modularize-pandas into bc9d113 on master.

@lrq3000
Copy link
Member Author

lrq3000 commented Sep 18, 2016

Also this can be interesting to add in the Readme or wiki: http://stackoverflow.com/a/39495229/1121352

@lrq3000
Copy link
Member Author

lrq3000 commented Sep 21, 2016

@casperdcl : I managed to get access to coveralls's tqdm account settings and I disabled github comments, so we should not get spam anymore hopefully. If it continues, I will remove coveralls entirely.

@CrazyPython
Copy link
Contributor

CrazyPython commented Sep 22, 2016

@lrq3000 If that doesn't work, use dig to find the location of their servers and use a chainsaw.

Kill it with fire!

if it's located in a former nuclear bunker then... uh... then...

Nuke it from orbit.

@lrq3000
Copy link
Member Author

lrq3000 commented Dec 29, 2016

See also #245.

@lrq3000
Copy link
Member Author

lrq3000 commented Dec 29, 2016

We really ought to merge this, the non-uniform API is confusing users: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40476680/how-to-use-tqdm-with-pandas-in-a-jupyter-notebook

@casperdcl casperdcl force-pushed the master branch 5 times, most recently from 09c631f to 6ec00f1 Compare July 22, 2017 14:11
@chengs
Copy link
Contributor

chengs commented Apr 16, 2018

is this still in the plan?

@casperdcl
Copy link
Member

yes, it's all part of M8 which we need to focus on

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
submodule ⊂ Periphery/subclasses to-review 🔍 Awaiting final confirmation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants