Skip to content

Conversation

pgajdos
Copy link
Contributor

@pgajdos pgajdos commented Oct 6, 2020

First attempt.

@pgajdos pgajdos marked this pull request as draft October 6, 2020 15:12
@pgajdos
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgajdos commented Oct 7, 2020

@casperdcl, are you interested in this pullrequest? I have to resolve lot of conflicts now, so I would like to ensure the time is effectively spent.

@casperdcl
Copy link
Member

@pgajdos sure, I finally reviewed and overhauled some of the tests in the last couple of releases but don't intend on making any more major changes so you can fix conflicts now :)

@casperdcl casperdcl changed the title do not depend on deprecated nose tests: replace nose => pytest Oct 8, 2020
@casperdcl casperdcl added eol ☠ Deprecations that are wont-fix candidates to-fix ⌛ In progress labels Oct 8, 2020
@casperdcl casperdcl added this to the Non-breaking milestone Oct 8, 2020
@casperdcl casperdcl added the p4-enhancement-future 🧨 On the back burner label Oct 8, 2020
@pgajdos
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgajdos commented Oct 12, 2020

@casperdcl okay, I will try to look at it this week again. Are you fine with the overall concept?

@pgajdos
Copy link
Contributor Author

pgajdos commented Oct 16, 2020

.

@pgajdos pgajdos closed this Oct 16, 2020
This was referenced Oct 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
eol ☠ Deprecations that are wont-fix candidates p4-enhancement-future 🧨 On the back burner to-fix ⌛ In progress
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants