Skip to content

Conversation

lucasmrod
Copy link
Contributor

Should fix #107

Copy link
Member

@brandur brandur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey, sorry for the delay on this. Seems reasonable to me — I'd actually forgotten the peeking behavior was built in already and it was just the RetryAfter piece that needed doing. Thanks!

@brandur brandur merged commit da10cb2 into throttled:master Aug 23, 2025
3 checks passed
@brandur
Copy link
Member

brandur commented Aug 23, 2025

Released as v2.15.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

RetryAfter is always -1 when peeking with quantity set to 0
2 participants