Skip to content

Conversation

MichaelSnowden
Copy link
Contributor

What changed?
I had a parallel test that looped over some configs, but I forgot to capture the range loop, so the behavior of the test was non-deterministic. I fixed it by capturing the range variable.

Why?
Because this was a bug (only in tests though).

How did you test it?
I reran the test, with coverage, and I verified that the coverage is 94.2%. Before, only some tests were run so it was only 29%.

Potential risks
None

Is hotfix candidate?
No

@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden requested a review from a team as a code owner December 19, 2022 19:21
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden merged commit e57edab into master Dec 20, 2022
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden deleted the durable-archival/range-variable branch December 20, 2022 20:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants