Skip to content

Conversation

kubbot
Copy link
Contributor

@kubbot kubbot commented Jun 24, 2025

User description

The make frontend-all command was failing because Jest was not interpreting the --passWithNoTests flag correctly when passed via pnpm test -- --passWithNoTests. Jest was treating the flag as a test file pattern.

This commit modifies frontend/package.json to include --passWithNoTests directly in the scripts.test value. The Makefile is also updated to remove the redundant flag from the frontend-test target.

This ensures that Jest finds and runs the existing tests, allowing make frontend-all to complete successfully.

🫰 Thanks for your Pull Request! Here are some helpful tips:

👀 Purpose and Importance of this PR:

  • My code conforms to the coding style of this project.
  • My code requires changes to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • All tests have passed.

🅰 Fixes for Issues:

Fixes #

📝 Notes for the Reviewer:

🎯 How to Verify this PR:

📑 Additional Documentation, e.g., KEPs (Telepace Enhancement Proposals), Usage Docs, etc.:


PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Fix Jest --passWithNoTests flag handling in frontend tests

  • Move flag from Makefile to package.json test script

  • Ensure make frontend-all command completes successfully


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Bug fix
Makefile
Remove redundant Jest flag from Makefile                                 

Makefile

  • Remove --passWithNoTests flag from frontend-test target
  • Simplify pnpm test command execution
  • +1/-1     
    package.json
    Add Jest flag to test script                                                         

    frontend/package.json

  • Add --passWithNoTests flag directly to test script
  • Ensure Jest runs properly when no tests are found
  • +1/-1     
    Additional files
    openapi.json +5393/-1

    Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • The `make frontend-all` command was failing because Jest was not
    interpreting the `--passWithNoTests` flag correctly when passed via
    `pnpm test -- --passWithNoTests`. Jest was treating the flag as a
    test file pattern.
    
    This commit modifies `frontend/package.json` to include
    `--passWithNoTests` directly in the `scripts.test` value.
    The `Makefile` is also updated to remove the redundant flag from
    the `frontend-test` target.
    
    This ensures that Jest finds and runs the existing tests, allowing
    `make frontend-all` to complete successfully.
    @kubbot kubbot requested a review from cubxxw as a code owner June 24, 2025 00:39
    @github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Backlog in nexus Jun 24, 2025
    Copy link
    Contributor

    coderabbitai bot commented Jun 24, 2025

    Important

    Review skipped

    Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

    Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

    You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


    Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Explain this complex logic.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Support

    Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Configuration Change

    The --passWithNoTests flag is now hardcoded in the test script, which means it will always pass even when no tests exist. This could mask legitimate test discovery issues and should be validated to ensure it doesn't hide real problems with test configuration or file patterns.

    "test": "jest --passWithNoTests",
    "coverage": "jest --coverage",

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    No code suggestions found for the PR.

    Copy link

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Jun 24, 2025

    CI Feedback 🧐

    (Feedback updated until commit c66b765)

    A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:

    Action: test-docker-compose

    Failed stage: Build and test services [❌]

    Failure summary:

    The action failed because the Docker service prestart didn't complete successfully and exited with
    code 1. The container nexus-prestart-1 failed to start properly, causing the entire Docker Compose
    deployment to fail.

    Relevant error logs:
    1:  ##[group]Runner Image Provisioner
    2:  Hosted Compute Agent
    ...
    
    100:  ##[endgroup]
    101:  ##[group]Determining the checkout info
    102:  ##[endgroup]
    103:  [command]/usr/bin/git sparse-checkout disable
    104:  [command]/usr/bin/git config --local --unset-all extensions.worktreeConfig
    105:  ##[group]Checking out the ref
    106:  [command]/usr/bin/git checkout --progress --force -B feat/optimize-deploy refs/remotes/origin/feat/optimize-deploy
    107:  Switched to a new branch 'feat/optimize-deploy'
    108:  branch 'feat/optimize-deploy' set up to track 'origin/feat/optimize-deploy'.
    109:  ##[endgroup]
    110:  [command]/usr/bin/git log -1 --format=%H
    111:  fbacf7478e602803d36e558546e169c46f0f6e10
    112:  ##[group]Run echo "Running as user: $(whoami)"
    113:  �[36;1mecho "Running as user: $(whoami)"�[0m
    114:  �[36;1mecho "Docker access test:"�[0m
    115:  �[36;1mdocker ps || echo "Docker access failed"�[0m
    116:  shell: /usr/bin/bash -e {0}
    ...
    
    435:  #32 17.37 Progress: resolved 355, reused 0, downloaded 299, added 299, done
    436:  #32 18.32 
    437:  #32 18.32 dependencies:
    438:  #32 18.32 + @chakra-ui/icons 2.2.4
    439:  #32 18.32 + @chakra-ui/react 3.21.0
    440:  #32 18.32 + @emotion/react 11.14.0
    441:  #32 18.32 + @tanstack/react-query 5.81.2
    442:  #32 18.32 + @tanstack/react-query-devtools 5.81.2
    443:  #32 18.32 + @tanstack/react-router 1.19.1 (1.121.34 is available)
    444:  #32 18.32 + axios 1.7.4 (1.10.0 is available)
    445:  #32 18.32 + crypto-js 4.2.0
    446:  #32 18.32 + form-data 4.0.0 (4.0.3 is available)
    447:  #32 18.32 + next-themes 0.4.6
    448:  #32 18.32 + react 18.3.1 (19.1.0 is available)
    449:  #32 18.32 + react-dom 18.3.1 (19.1.0 is available)
    450:  #32 18.32 + react-error-boundary 4.1.2 (6.0.0 is available)
    451:  #32 18.32 + react-hook-form 7.49.3 (7.58.1 is available)
    ...
    
    1621:  Container nexus-admin-1  Starting
    1622:  Container nexus-db-1  Started
    1623:  Container nexus-pgadmin-1  Starting
    1624:  Container nexus-db-1  Waiting
    1625:  Container nexus-admin-1  Started
    1626:  Container nexus-frontend-1  Started
    1627:  Container nexus-pgadmin-1  Started
    1628:  Container nexus-db-1  Healthy
    1629:  Container nexus-prestart-1  Starting
    1630:  Container nexus-prestart-1  Started
    1631:  Container nexus-db-1  Waiting
    1632:  Container nexus-prestart-1  Waiting
    1633:  Container nexus-db-1  Healthy
    1634:  Container nexus-prestart-1  service "prestart" didn't complete successfully: exit 1
    1635:  service "prestart" didn't complete successfully: exit 1
    1636:  ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
    1637:  Post job cleanup.
    

    Copy link
    Member

    @cubxxw cubxxw left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    d

    @github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog to In review in nexus Jun 24, 2025
    @cubxxw cubxxw merged commit 9a0f31f into feat/optimize-deploy Jun 24, 2025
    6 of 14 checks passed
    @github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In review to Done in nexus Jun 24, 2025
    @cubxxw cubxxw deleted the fix/frontend-tests-not-found branch June 24, 2025 01:16
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    Status: Done
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants