Skip to content

Conversation

bterlson
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ljharb ljharb merged commit b68661c into tc39:master Jul 11, 2017
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Inactive proposals are proposals that at one point were presented to the committ
| [Proposed Grammar change to ES Modules](https://github.com/bmeck/UnambiguousJavaScriptGrammar) | Bradley Farias | Rejected: No consensus on this specific solution.
| [Dynamic Module Reform](https://github.com/caridy/proposal-dynamic-modules) | Caridy Patiño | Withdrawn: we decided to preserve the current semantics
| [SIMD.JS - SIMD APIs](https://github.com/tc39/ecmascript_simd/) | Peter Jensen, Yehuda Katz | [Stage 1](https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es8/2017-03/mar-21.md#conclusionresolution-10): Start with SIMD in WASM; implementations not pursuing SIMD.js for now.

| [Updates to Tail Calls to include an explicit syntactic opt-in](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-ptc-syntax) | Brian Terlson & Eric Faust | Withdrawn in favor of ES6 PTC |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had a bit more hope for STC--it doesn't seem like anyone's pursuing it at the moment, but I think it's a pretty reasonable thing to bring back up in the future... Would "Inactive in favor of ES6 PTC" be reasonable wording?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suppose withdrawn is more correct, yes. I'll send a subsequent PR I guess.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants