Skip to content

Conversation

tuannvm
Copy link
Owner

@tuannvm tuannvm commented May 17, 2025

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant GH as GitHub
    participant GA as GitHub Actions
    participant D as Dagger
    participant AI as AI Service (Gemini)
    participant BE as Backend
    participant FE as Frontend

    %% 1. User creates a comment with a slash command
    U->>GH: Creates comment with /agent, /review, or /develop
    
    %% 2. GitHub triggers the workflow
    GH->>GA: Triggers workflow on issue_comment:created
    
    %% 3. Generate GitHub App token
    GA->>GH: Generate token (actions/create-github-app-token)
    GH-->>GA: Returns app token
    
    %% 4. Checkout code
    GA->>GH: Checkout repository (actions/checkout@v4)
    
    %% 5. Setup Dagger
    GA->>D: Setup Dagger environment
    
    %% Conditional flows based on slash command
    alt /agent command (on PR)
        GA->>D: dagger call pull-request-feedback
        D->>AI: Analyze code with feedback
        AI-->>D: Returns analysis
        D->>GH: Post feedback as comment
        
    else /review command (on PR)
        GA->>D: dagger call pull-request-review
        D->>BE: Run backend tests
        D->>FE: Run frontend tests
        D->>AI: Generate code review
        AI-->>D: Returns review
        D->>GH: Post review as comment
        
    else /develop command (on issue)
        GA->>D: dagger call develop-pull-request
        D->>AI: Generate implementation
        AI-->>D: Returns code changes
        D->>GH: Create PR with changes
    end
    
    %% Notify completion
    GH-->>U: Shows updated comment with results
Loading

Summary

This pull request introduces significant improvements to the workspace management module, including the addition of functions for reading, writing, resetting, and diffing directories within the workspace. Additionally, it refactors the code structure for more modular and maintainable testing, using Dagger containers for file and directory operations. Alongside the core code updates, new GitHub Actions workflows are added to streamline CI/CD processes, including slash command interactions, check routines, and usage comment automation.

Affected Modules

  • /.dagger/workspace/main.go: New workspace management functions (Read, Write, Reset, Tree, Diff, Check)
  • .github/workflows/: Multiple CI/CD workflows including slack-commands, test, and usage-comments

Key Details

  • Workspace Handling: Implemented file operations (Read, Write), workspace resetting (Reset), directory structure visualization (Tree), and change detection (Diff).
  • Containerized Checks: Utilized Dagger containers with Alpine images for directory tree visualization and diff operations.
  • Workflow Automation:
    • Slash command triggers for PR review and development workflows.
    • CI pipeline that excludes main branch pushes.
    • Automated comments on PRs with usage commands.
    • Check routine using dagger call check.
    • Configuration file dagger.json is added for project dependencies and metadata.

Potential Impacts

  • Improves developer productivity with streamlined workspace management.
  • Automates review workflows, reducing manual overhead.
  • Enhances code modularity and testability.
  • The new workflows and functions may require environment configuration updates, especially regarding secrets and permissions.

Suggested Testing Steps

  • Verify the Workspace methods (Read, Write, Reset, Tree, Diff, Check) by creating unit tests or manual script executions within local or CI environments.
  • Trigger PR events to validate comment posting and slash command responses.
  • Confirm the functionality of CI/CD workflows by pushing test branches and observing the execution logs.
  • Validate diff and tree outputs to ensure directory operations reflect the actual project state.

Note: Ensure that secrets (GITHUB_TOKEN, DAGGER_CLOUD_TOKEN, OPENAI_API_KEY) are configured properly in the repository settings before testing workflows.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced automated workflows for CI checks, pull request feedback, code review, and usage comments via GitHub Actions.
    • Added AI-powered development, review, and debugging capabilities for pull requests and issues, including automated test fixing and feedback handling.
    • Provided structured prompts and guidelines for assignments, feedback, test fixing, and code review to ensure code quality and best practices.
    • Implemented workspace management tools for file operations, formatting, and validation within the development environment.
    • Added backend build, test, lint, containerization, and release management features integrated with GitHub workflows.
  • Chores

    • Added configuration files for Dagger and Go modules to manage dependencies, builds, and environments.
    • Updated .gitignore and .gitattributes to properly handle generated files and directories across the project.

Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 17, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This update introduces a modular Dagger-based development and CI/CD environment for the haproxy-mcp-server project. It adds Go modules, backend and workspace abstractions, AI-driven development and review automation, structured prompts, and GitHub Actions workflows for CI, PR feedback, and usage comments. Generated code and build artifacts are managed with .gitattributes and .gitignore files.

Changes

File(s) / Path(s) Change Summary
.dagger/.gitattributes, .dagger/backend/.gitattributes, .dagger/workspace/.gitattributes Added .gitattributes files marking generated files and directories as linguist-generated for GitHub.
.dagger/.gitignore, .dagger/backend/.gitignore, .dagger/workspace/.gitignore Added .gitignore files ignoring generated files and internal directories in Dagger modules.
.dagger/backend/dagger.json, .dagger/workspace/dagger.json, dagger.json Added Dagger configuration JSON files specifying engine version, SDK source, and dependencies for backend, workspace, and root project.
.dagger/backend/go.mod, .dagger/go.mod, .dagger/workspace/go.mod Added Go module files declaring dependencies, Go versions, and replace directives for backend, main, and workspace modules.
.dagger/backend/main.go Added Backend struct with methods for linting, formatting, checking, building, containerizing, and serving the backend Go code.
.dagger/main.go Added HaproxyMcpServer struct with methods for linting, checking, building, serving, and releasing the backend, integrating backend logic and GitHub release workflows.
.dagger/workspace/main.go Added Workspace type managing mutable directory state with read, write, reset, tree, check, and diff operations, plus a Checkable interface.
.dagger/debugger.go Added AI-powered debugging methods for broken tests and PRs in the HaproxyMcpServer type, integrating LLM and GitHub commenting.
.dagger/develop.go Added AI-driven development automation methods for assignment completion, PR creation, and feedback incorporation on HaproxyMcpServer.
.dagger/review.go Added automated code review methods for AI-driven PR review and GitHub integration on HaproxyMcpServer.
.dagger/suggestions.go Added code to parse unified diffs and extract code suggestions for posting as GitHub PR comments.
.dagger/prompts/assignment.md, .dagger/prompts/feedback.md, .dagger/prompts/fix_tests.md, .dagger/prompts/review.md Added structured markdown prompt files guiding assignment completion, feedback processing, test fixing, and code review for the project.
.github/workflows/slash-commands.yml, .github/workflows/test.yml, .github/workflows/usage-comments.yml Added GitHub Actions workflows to handle slash commands on PRs/issues, run CI checks on branches, and post PR usage comments.

Sequence Diagram(s)

AI-Driven Pull Request Feedback Flow

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub
    participant Workflow
    participant Dagger
    participant OpenAI

    User->>GitHub: Comments "/agent" on PR
    GitHub->>Workflow: Triggers slash-commands workflow
    Workflow->>Dagger: Calls pull-request-feedback with PR info
    Dagger->>OpenAI: Runs LLM agent with feedback prompt
    OpenAI-->>Dagger: Returns updated code suggestions
    Dagger->>GitHub: Posts code suggestions as PR comments
Loading

Automated CI Check Flow

sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub
    participant Workflow
    participant Dagger

    GitHub->>Workflow: Push to branch (not main)
    Workflow->>Dagger: Runs "check" command with commit info
    Dagger->>Dagger: Lint, Test, Build backend
    Dagger-->>Workflow: Returns results
    Workflow-->>GitHub: Reports CI status
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐇
In Dagger’s warren, code now hops,
With prompts and bots and CI stops.
PRs reviewed by AI’s might,
Tests and builds run day and night.
Workflows, modules, all in tune—
This rabbit’s code will ship soon!
🥕

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (1.64.8)

Error: you are using a configuration file for golangci-lint v2 with golangci-lint v1: please use golangci-lint v2
Failed executing command with error: you are using a configuration file for golangci-lint v2 with golangci-lint v1: please use golangci-lint v2


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c93b942 and b773fe6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .dagger/backend/main.go (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/main.go (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
module dagger/workspace

Check warning

Code scanning / Trivy

golang.org/x/net/html: Incorrect Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation in x/net in golang.org/x/net Medium

Package: golang.org/x/net
Installed Version: v0.37.0
Vulnerability CVE-2025-22872
Severity: MEDIUM
Fixed Version: 0.38.0
Link: CVE-2025-22872
tuannvm added 6 commits May 16, 2025 18:54
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
@tuannvm tuannvm marked this pull request as ready for review May 17, 2025 02:22
@tuannvm
Copy link
Owner Author

tuannvm commented May 17, 2025

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 17, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@tuannvm tuannvm changed the title feat(backend): initialize backend and frontend modules with setup files Enhance Workspace Module and CI/CD GitHub Workflows May 17, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 22

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

15-21: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix CLI argument interpolation
The --github-token GH_TOKEN flag passes the literal string GH_TOKEN. It must interpolate the environment variable:

- run: dagger call check --github-token GH_TOKEN --model gpt-4.1 --commit $GITHUB_SHA
+ run: dagger call check --github-token $GH_TOKEN --model gpt-4.1 --commit $GITHUB_SHA
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.dagger/main.go (1)

112-118: Same alias problem leaks here

dag.GithubRelease() won’t compile until the alias issue above is fixed (or call dagger.GithubRelease()). Be sure to update this block after adjusting the import.

.dagger/develop.go (1)

3-9: Consistent aliasing required across modules

All three new files import the same internal dagger package but rely on the identifier dag. Apply the alias fix here as well, otherwise none of the generated code will build.

🧹 Nitpick comments (29)
.dagger/prompts/fix_tests.md (2)

9-9: Hyphenate “Problem-Solving” for consistency
Per LanguageTool’s suggestion, use a hyphen in the section title to match standard terminology.

-## Problem Solving Process
+## Problem-Solving Process
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~9-~9: This noun or verb “Problem-Solving” is spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...to build, test, and modify the code ## Problem Solving Process 1. Run the tests to identify wh...

(PROBLEM_SOLVE_HYPHEN)


24-24: Use concise wording for task status
Avoid wordiness by replacing “not complete” with “incomplete”:

-- The task is not complete until all tests pass successfully
+- The task is incomplete until all tests pass successfully
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~24-~24: Consider using “incomplete” to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...r each significant change - The task is not complete until all tests pass successfully

(NOT_ABLE_PREMIUM)

.dagger/workspace/.gitignore (1)

2-4: Ensure directory patterns include trailing slash
To explicitly denote directories and avoid ambiguity, append / to each directory path:

-/internal/dagger
-/internal/querybuilder
-/internal/telemetry
+/internal/dagger/
+/internal/querybuilder/
+/internal/telemetry/
.dagger/.gitignore (1)

4-5: Normalize directory ignore patterns with trailing slashes
For consistency across .gitignore files, explicitly mark directories:

-/internal/dagger
-/internal/telemetry
+/internal/dagger/
+/internal/telemetry/
.dagger/backend/.gitignore (1)

4-5: Add trailing slashes to directory entries
Align with other modules by clearly indicating these are directories:

-/internal/dagger
-/internal/telemetry
+/internal/dagger/
+/internal/telemetry/
.github/workflows/usage-comments.yml (2)

1-5: Expand workflow triggers for comment updates
The workflow only runs on PR opened events. To ensure comments stay updated when the PR changes, include synchronize and reopened events under pull_request.types.


6-25: Add concurrency to prevent redundant jobs
Without a concurrency group, rapid updates can queue multiple comment jobs. Define a concurrency block to cancel in-progress runs for the same PR.

Example addition:

  comment:
    concurrency:
      group: usage-comment-${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
      cancel-in-progress: true
.dagger/backend/go.mod (1)

46-53: Consolidate or remove redundant replace directives
You’re replacing packages at the same version you already require (v0.8.0). Consider removing these replaces if they’re not overriding a different transitive version, or grouping them together for readability.

dagger.json (1)

17-21: Avoid duplicate commit specifiers
For github-release, both source and pin specify the same commit. You can streamline by removing @c6081b3210407d5ea49fce8874c5104afa8373cb from source and relying solely on pin.

.github/workflows/test.yml (2)

1-4: Simplify branch filters
Using branches: ["**", "!main"] works but can be simplified to:

on:
  push:
    branches-ignore:
      - main

This is clearer and more idiomatic.


10-12: Streamline token setup
Instead of manually echoing the GitHub token, consider:

- uses: actions/github-script@v6
  id: generate-token
  with:
    script: return process.env.GITHUB_TOKEN

This reduces shell usage and simplifies token retrieval.

.dagger/go.mod (1)

46-53: Consolidate replace directives
As with the backend module, consider grouping or removing replaces that match required versions exactly.

.dagger/prompts/assignment.md (2)

3-3: Apply hyphenation for consistency
The heading “Problem solving process” should be hyphenated for clarity:

- ## Problem solving process
+ ## Problem-solving process
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~3-~3: This noun or verb “Problem-solving” is spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...ement Control Plane) Server project ## Problem solving process 1. Consider the assignment's i...

(PROBLEM_SOLVE_HYPHEN)


29-30: Prefer concise wording
To reduce wordiness, change:

- The assignment is not complete until all tests pass and the implementation meets requirements
+ The assignment is incomplete until all tests pass and the implementation meets requirements
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~30-~30: Consider using “incomplete” to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...fter making changes - The assignment is not complete until all tests pass and the implementa...

(NOT_ABLE_PREMIUM)

.dagger/prompts/review.md (1)

1-61: Well-structured review prompt with comprehensive guidelines

This review prompt provides an excellent framework for structured code reviews of the HAProxy MCP Server project. The format is clear, comprehensive, and covers all essential aspects of a thorough code review process.

Consider adding a section about how to handle follow-up comments or responses to address reviewer feedback, which would complete the review cycle.

Consider hyphenating "Problem solving" on line 4 to "Problem-solving" for grammatical correctness.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[misspelling] ~26-~26: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...ards? - Are there any code smells or anti-patterns? ## Good Pull Request Criteria - The ...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_ANTI_PATTERNS)


[style] ~41-~41: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...Any show-stopping problems that must be fixed - Suggestions: Recommended improvem...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

.dagger/prompts/feedback.md (1)

4-5: Grammar correction needed

The term should be hyphenated as "Problem-solving process" rather than "Problem solving process".

-## Problem solving process
+## Problem-solving process
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~4-~4: This noun or verb “Problem-solving” is spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...eceived feedback on a pull request. ## Problem solving process 1. Carefully review the origin...

(PROBLEM_SOLVE_HYPHEN)

.github/workflows/slash-commands.yml (1)

9-11: Unnecessary token generation step

This step simply echoes the github.token to an output variable, but GitHub Actions already provides github.token directly. You could simplify by using ${{ github.token }} directly in later steps.

.dagger/suggestions.go (1)

16-80: Consider refactoring complex diff parsing logic

The parseDiff function handles multiple concerns (file detection, line tracking, suggestion building) in one large function. Consider breaking it into smaller, focused functions for better readability and maintainability.

.dagger/workspace/go.mod (1)

10-21: Version drift between OpenTelemetry core (v1.34.x) and log exporter (v0.8.x)

Mixing major-version series (v1.* vs v0.*) can introduce subtle incompatibilities.
Consider pinning all OpenTelemetry-log packages to the same minor stream as the core SDK, or explicitly document why the mix is required.

.dagger/review.go (1)

37-40: Unbounded .Loop() may create runaway token usage

LLM(...).Loop() will iterate until the agent decides to stop. For safety (cost / latency), consider adding an explicit iteration or token cap if the API supports it, e.g.:

agent := dag.LLM(dagger.LLMOpts{Model: model}).
    WithEnv(env).
    WithPromptFile(prompt).
-   Loop()
+   Loop(dagger.LoopOpts{MaxIterations: 5})
.dagger/debugger.go (1)

75-90: Handle parseDiff errors and empty suggestions early

If parseDiff returns an unexpected structure (nil slice, malformed hunks, etc.) the subsequent loop will silently no-op or panic.

Add simple validation:

if len(codeSuggestions) == 0 {
    return fmt.Errorf("unable to parse diff into suggestions")
}
.dagger/develop.go (2)

33-37: Potential infinite loop with LLM().Loop()

dag.LLM(...).Loop() keeps sending the prompt until the agent signals it is finished. If the prompt template or model mis-behaves this can create an endless run and burn API credits. Consider introducing a max-iterations guard or time-out parameter so CI jobs don’t hang indefinitely.


144-145: Slash-command stripping misses newline-only invocations

You only remove the exact substring "/agent " (note the space). A user typing /agent\n or /agent will not be stripped. A safer approach is:

feedback = strings.TrimPrefix(strings.TrimSpace(feedback), "/agent")
.dagger/backend/main.go (6)

97-97: Pinned container image with SHA is good, but needs update process

Using a pinned image with SHA is excellent for reproducibility. However, ensure you have a process to periodically update this hash to receive security updates.


103-103: Port configuration documentation needs improvement

The comment indicates port 8080 is the "default HAProxy MCP Server port" but suggests it might need to be updated. Consider making this port configurable via a parameter to increase flexibility.

-	// Expose the default HAProxy MCP Server port (update if different)
-	WithExposedPort(8080).
+	// Expose the HAProxy MCP Server port
+	WithExposedPort(port).

And update the method signature:

func (b *Backend) Container(
	// +optional
	arch string,
	// +optional
	port int,
) *dagger.Container {
	if arch == "" {
		arch = runtime.GOARCH
	}
	if port == 0 {
		port = 8080  // Default port
	}
	// ... rest of the method

148-149: Using specific Go version without future-proofing

The code uses "golang:1.24" which might become outdated. Consider using a more flexible version reference or documenting the version requirement.

-	From("golang:1.24").
+	From("golang:latest").  // Or a specific version with a comment about update process

152-153: Error handling missing for file formatting operations

The FormatFile method doesn't handle potential errors if the file doesn't exist or if gopls fails to format it. Consider adding error checking or documenting the expected behavior.

The Dagger model might handle these errors implicitly, but it would be good to document this behavior or add explicit checks.


36-43: Format method could be more explicit

The Format method combines two operations (standard Go formatting and lint fixing) without explicit documentation. Consider adding a comment to clarify what formatting operations are being performed.

// Formatter
+// Format applies standard Go formatting (gofmt) and fixes golangci-lint auto-fixable issues
func (b *Backend) Format() *dagger.Directory {
	return dag.
		Golang().
		WithSource(b.Source).
		Fmt().
		GolangciLintFix()
}

58-70: Build method parameter validation

The Build method accepts an architecture parameter but doesn't validate it beyond checking if it's empty. Consider adding validation to ensure the architecture is supported.

func (b *Backend) Build(
	// +optional
	arch string,
) *dagger.Directory {
	if arch == "" {
		arch = runtime.GOARCH
+	} else {
+		// Validate architecture is supported
+		supportedArchs := map[string]bool{"amd64": true, "arm64": true, "386": true}
+		if _, supported := supportedArchs[arch]; !supported {
+			// Log a warning or return an error
+			// For now, falling back to current architecture
+			arch = runtime.GOARCH
+		}
	}
	return dag.
		Golang().
		WithSource(b.Source).
		Build([]string{}, dagger.GolangBuildOpts{Arch: arch})
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a77a848 and c662e1a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • .dagger/backend/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • .dagger/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • .dagger/workspace/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
  • .dagger/.gitattributes (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/backend/.gitattributes (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/backend/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/backend/dagger.json (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/backend/go.mod (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/backend/main.go (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/debugger.go (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/develop.go (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/go.mod (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/main.go (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/prompts/assignment.md (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/prompts/feedback.md (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/prompts/fix_tests.md (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/prompts/review.md (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/review.go (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/suggestions.go (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/workspace/.gitattributes (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/workspace/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/workspace/dagger.json (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/workspace/go.mod (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/workspace/main.go (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/slash-commands.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/usage-comments.yml (1 hunks)
  • dagger.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (3)
.dagger/debugger.go (2)
.dagger/main.go (2)
  • HaproxyMcpServer (10-21)
  • New (23-46)
.dagger/backend/main.go (2)
  • Backend (10-12)
  • New (14-18)
.dagger/develop.go (3)
.dagger/main.go (1)
  • HaproxyMcpServer (10-21)
.dagger/workspace/main.go (1)
  • Workspace (18-24)
.dagger/backend/main.go (1)
  • Backend (10-12)
.dagger/main.go (1)
.dagger/backend/main.go (2)
  • Backend (10-12)
  • New (14-18)
🪛 LanguageTool
.dagger/prompts/assignment.md

[grammar] ~3-~3: This noun or verb “Problem-solving” is spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...ement Control Plane) Server project ## Problem solving process 1. Consider the assignment's i...

(PROBLEM_SOLVE_HYPHEN)


[style] ~30-~30: Consider using “incomplete” to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...fter making changes - The assignment is not complete until all tests pass and the implementa...

(NOT_ABLE_PREMIUM)

.dagger/prompts/review.md

[misspelling] ~26-~26: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...ards? - Are there any code smells or anti-patterns? ## Good Pull Request Criteria - The ...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_ANTI_PATTERNS)


[style] ~41-~41: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...Any show-stopping problems that must be fixed - Suggestions: Recommended improvem...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

.dagger/prompts/fix_tests.md

[grammar] ~9-~9: This noun or verb “Problem-Solving” is spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...to build, test, and modify the code ## Problem Solving Process 1. Run the tests to identify wh...

(PROBLEM_SOLVE_HYPHEN)


[style] ~24-~24: Consider using “incomplete” to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...r each significant change - The task is not complete until all tests pass successfully

(NOT_ABLE_PREMIUM)

.dagger/prompts/feedback.md

[grammar] ~4-~4: This noun or verb “Problem-solving” is spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...eceived feedback on a pull request. ## Problem solving process 1. Carefully review the origin...

(PROBLEM_SOLVE_HYPHEN)

🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
.github/workflows/slash-commands.yml

16-16: "github.event.comment.body" is potentially untrusted. avoid using it directly in inline scripts. instead, pass it through an environment variable. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-for-github-actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions for more details

(expression)


29-29: if: condition "${{ !github.event.issue.pull_request }} && contains(github.event.comment.body, '/develop')" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}

(if-cond)

🪛 GitHub Check: Trivy
.dagger/workspace/go.mod

[warning] 1-1: golang.org/x/net/html: Incorrect Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation in x/net in golang.org/x/net
Package: golang.org/x/net
Installed Version: v0.37.0
Vulnerability CVE-2025-22872
Severity: MEDIUM
Fixed Version: 0.38.0
Link: CVE-2025-22872

🔇 Additional comments (15)
.dagger/workspace/dagger.json (1)

1-7: Valid JSON configuration
The JSON is well-formed, follows the expected schema, and correctly pins the Dagger engine version. No changes needed.

.dagger/workspace/.gitattributes (1)

1-4: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix pattern matching for generated files
Patterns in this .gitattributes use leading slashes, matching repo root rather than files in .dagger/workspace, so they won't correctly mark generated files. Also, attribute syntax is inconsistent.
Please update to relative patterns and linguist-generated=true.

Proposed diff:

--- .dagger/workspace/.gitattributes
+++ .dagger/workspace/.gitattributes
@@
- /dagger.gen.go linguist-generated
- /internal/dagger/** linguist-generated
- /internal/querybuilder/** linguist-generated
- /internal/telemetry/** linguist-generated
+ dagger.gen.go linguist-generated=true
+ internal/dagger/** linguist-generated=true
+ internal/querybuilder/** linguist-generated=true
+ internal/telemetry/** linguist-generated=true

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

.dagger/backend/go.mod (2)

7-11: Direct dependencies look correct
The required packages for GraphQL code generation and concurrency (gqlgen, genqlient, x/sync) align with the backend’s needs.


13-22: Indirect dependencies are properly declared
The pinned indirect dependencies (logging, OpenTelemetry, gRPC, etc.) are consistent and cover the necessary stack without version conflicts.

dagger.json (6)

1-6: Header fields are valid
name, engineVersion, and sdk.source correctly identify the project and Go SDK.


7-12: Local dependencies configured correctly
The backend and workspace dependencies correctly point to .dagger/backend and .dagger/workspace respectively.


13-16: Pin remote github-issue dependency
The pin field locks the version as intended. Optionally, you could embed the commit in source (e.g., .../github-issue@46246adc...) for symmetry with other entries, but it’s not required.


22-26: Proxy dependency pinned appropriately
The proxy module uses both semantic version and commit pin, ensuring reproducibility.


27-30: Workspace dependency is correct
Local workspace module declaration is accurate.


31-33: Project source directory set
The source field points to .dagger, ensuring Dagger uses the correct working directory.

.dagger/go.mod (3)

1-6: Module path and Go tooling are correct
The path github.com/tuannvm/haproxy-mcp-server/.dagger matches the repository layout. Go version and toolchain settings align with the submodules.


7-11: Core dependencies validated
Essential libraries (gqlgen, genqlient, x/sync) are correctly required for workspace tooling.


13-22: Indirect dependencies look good
Logging, telemetry, protobuf, and utility packages are pinned appropriately.

.dagger/prompts/feedback.md (1)

1-41: Well-structured feedback guidance

The overall structure and content of this prompt provides clear guidance for addressing PR feedback. It effectively walks through the problem-solving process and establishes appropriate constraints.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~4-~4: This noun or verb “Problem-solving” is spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...eceived feedback on a pull request. ## Problem solving process 1. Carefully review the origin...

(PROBLEM_SOLVE_HYPHEN)

.dagger/suggestions.go (1)

51-53: Logic clarity concern with line tracking

The condition if !removalReached for incrementing the line counter is not intuitive and might lead to incorrect line tracking in complex diffs. Consider adding a comment explaining this logic or refactoring for clarity.

Comment on lines +1 to +5
/dagger.gen.go linguist-generated=true
/querybuilder/** linguist-generated
/internal/dagger/** linguist-generated
/internal/querybuilder/** linguist-generated
/internal/telemetry/** linguist-generated
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Normalize gitattributes patterns and attributes
Mixed use of linguist-generated and linguist-generated=true alongside leading slashes will prevent correct matching. Use relative paths without slashes and a unified linguist-generated=true.

Proposed diff:

--- .dagger/.gitattributes
+++ .dagger/.gitattributes
@@
- /dagger.gen.go linguist-generated=true
- /querybuilder/** linguist-generated
- /internal/dagger/** linguist-generated
- /internal/querybuilder/** linguist-generated
- /internal/telemetry/** linguist-generated
+ dagger.gen.go linguist-generated=true
+ querybuilder/** linguist-generated=true
+ internal/dagger/** linguist-generated=true
+ internal/querybuilder/** linguist-generated=true
+ internal/telemetry/** linguist-generated=true
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
/dagger.gen.go linguist-generated=true
/querybuilder/** linguist-generated
/internal/dagger/** linguist-generated
/internal/querybuilder/** linguist-generated
/internal/telemetry/** linguist-generated
dagger.gen.go linguist-generated=true
querybuilder/** linguist-generated=true
internal/dagger/** linguist-generated=true
internal/querybuilder/** linguist-generated=true
internal/telemetry/** linguist-generated=true
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .dagger/.gitattributes lines 1 to 5, the patterns use inconsistent leading
slashes and mixed attribute formats for linguist-generated. Remove leading
slashes from paths, use relative paths, and unify all attributes to
linguist-generated=true for consistent matching. Update each line accordingly to
follow this normalized pattern.

Comment on lines +1 to +5
/dagger.gen.go linguist-generated
/querybuilder/** linguist-generated
/internal/dagger/** linguist-generated
/internal/querybuilder/** linguist-generated
/internal/telemetry/** linguist-generated
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Correct attribute patterns in backend gitattributes
Leading slashes prevent matching the intended files under .dagger/backend. Unify on linguist-generated=true and remove slashes to ensure files are recognized as generated.

Suggested diff:

--- .dagger/backend/.gitattributes
+++ .dagger/backend/.gitattributes
@@
- /dagger.gen.go linguist-generated
- /querybuilder/** linguist-generated
- /internal/dagger/** linguist-generated
- /internal/querybuilder/** linguist-generated
- /internal/telemetry/** linguist-generated
+ dagger.gen.go linguist-generated=true
+ querybuilder/** linguist-generated=true
+ internal/dagger/** linguist-generated=true
+ internal/querybuilder/** linguist-generated=true
+ internal/telemetry/** linguist-generated=true
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
/dagger.gen.go linguist-generated
/querybuilder/** linguist-generated
/internal/dagger/** linguist-generated
/internal/querybuilder/** linguist-generated
/internal/telemetry/** linguist-generated
dagger.gen.go linguist-generated=true
querybuilder/** linguist-generated=true
internal/dagger/** linguist-generated=true
internal/querybuilder/** linguist-generated=true
internal/telemetry/** linguist-generated=true
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .dagger/backend/.gitattributes lines 1 to 5, remove the leading slashes from
the attribute patterns so they correctly match files under the .dagger/backend
directory. Also, unify the attribute by setting linguist-generated=true for all
patterns to ensure these files are properly recognized as generated by GitHub
linguist.

Comment on lines +1 to +14
{
"name": "backend",
"engineVersion": "v0.18.8",
"sdk": {
"source": "go"
},
"dependencies": [
{
"name": "golang",
"source": "github.com/kpenfound/dagger-modules/golang",
"pin": "f7964245d0146dd3810f247c6c09eb33518d4654"
}
]
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify pinned Dagger dependency commit
Ensure that the pinned commit f7964245d0146dd3810f247c6c09eb33518d4654 for github.com/kpenfound/dagger-modules/golang exists and is compatible with engineVersion: v0.18.8.

Run this script:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify pinned commit exists on GitHub
gh api repos/kpenfound/dagger-modules/git/commits/f7964245d0146dd3810f247c6c09eb33518d4654 | jq .sha

Length of output: 145


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch the module's dagger.json at the pinned commit to check engineVersion compatibility
gh api repos/kpenfound/dagger-modules/contents/golang/dagger.json -F ref=f7964245d0146dd3810f247c6c09eb33518d4654 --jq .content | base64 -d

Length of output: 238


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch and decode the module's dagger.json at the pinned commit to verify engineVersion
gh api repos/kpenfound/dagger-modules/contents/golang/dagger.json -F ref=f7964245d0146dd3810f247c6c09eb33518d4654 --jq .content | \
python3 - << 'EOF'
import sys, base64, json
data = base64.b64decode(sys.stdin.read())
print(data.decode())
EOF

Length of output: 142


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# List root contents of the dagger-modules repo to locate the Go module directory
gh api repos/kpenfound/dagger-modules/contents --jq '.[] | "\(.type)\t\(.name)"'

Length of output: 303


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# List contents of the golang module directory to locate the module definition file
gh api repos/kpenfound/dagger-modules/contents/golang --jq '.[] | "\(.type)\t\(.name)"'

Length of output: 194


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch raw dagger.json of the pinned commit via raw.githubusercontent to verify engineVersion
curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kpenfound/dagger-modules/f7964245d0146dd3810f247c6c09eb33518d4654/golang/dagger.json | jq .

Length of output: 224


Mismatch in engineVersion between backend and golang module
The pinned commit f7964245d0146dd3810f247c6c09eb33518d4654 for github.com/kpenfound/dagger-modules/golang defines its own engineVersion as v0.18.6, but your backend is set to v0.18.8. This mismatch can lead to unexpected incompatibilities at runtime.

Please update one of the following:

  • Pin a newer commit of the golang module that specifies engineVersion: "v0.18.8"
  • Or revert your backend’s engineVersion to "v0.18.6" if that aligns with your intended Dagger engine version

Locations to update:

  • .dagger/backend/dagger.json
    • line 2: "engineVersion": "v0.18.8"
    • dependencies[0].pin: f7964245d0146dd3810f247c6c09eb33518d4654
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .dagger/backend/dagger.json around lines 1 to 14, there is a mismatch between
the backend's engineVersion "v0.18.8" and the pinned golang module's
engineVersion "v0.18.6". To fix this, either update the pinned commit of the
golang module to one that uses engineVersion "v0.18.8" or change the backend's
engineVersion to "v0.18.6" to match the pinned module. Ensure the engineVersion
in line 2 and the dependencies[0].pin are consistent to avoid runtime
incompatibilities.

Comment on lines +1 to +6
module backend

go 1.23.0

toolchain go1.23.6

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Use canonical module path
The module path backend is ambiguous and may cause import resolution errors. It should reflect the repository import path, for example:

module github.com/tuannvm/haproxy-mcp-server/.dagger/backend
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .dagger/backend/go.mod lines 1 to 6, the module path is set to a generic name
"backend" which can cause import resolution issues. Update the module path to
the full canonical repository import path, such as
"github.com/tuannvm/haproxy-mcp-server/.dagger/backend", to ensure proper module
resolution and avoid ambiguity.

Comment on lines +26 to +27
- This is a Go-based HAProxy MCP (Model Context Protocol) Server
- The server provides management and control plane functionality for HAProxy instances
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Inconsistency in acronym definition

The acronym MCP is defined as "Model Context Protocol" here, but in the review.md file, it's defined as "Management Control Plane". Ensure consistency across documentation.

-This is a Go-based HAProxy MCP (Model Context Protocol) Server
+This is a Go-based HAProxy MCP (Management Control Plane) Server
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- This is a Go-based HAProxy MCP (Model Context Protocol) Server
- The server provides management and control plane functionality for HAProxy instances
- This is a Go-based HAProxy MCP (Management Control Plane) Server
- The server provides management and control plane functionality for HAProxy instances
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .dagger/prompts/feedback.md around lines 26 to 27, the acronym MCP is defined
as "Model Context Protocol" which conflicts with the definition "Management
Control Plane" in review.md. Update the acronym definition in feedback.md to
"Management Control Plane" to maintain consistency across documentation.

Comment on lines +1 to +8
package main

import (
"context"
"runtime"

"backend/internal/dagger"
)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Package name inconsistency with its purpose

The main package is typically used for executables that have a main() function, but this file appears to be intended as a library that defines a Backend type with various methods. Consider renaming this package to better reflect its purpose, such as backend or another descriptive name.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .dagger/backend/main.go at lines 1 to 8, the package is named "main" which is
inconsistent with the file's purpose as it defines a Backend type and methods
rather than an executable. Rename the package from "main" to "backend" or
another descriptive name that reflects its library role to improve clarity and
maintain Go conventions.

Comment on lines +109 to +112
// Add health check if needed
// Note: The base image doesn't include wget or curl by default
// You might want to use a different health check mechanism or a different base image

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Missing health check implementation

The comment indicates health checks are not implemented. For a production-ready container, health checks are essential. Consider implementing a basic health check or documenting why it's deferred.

You could add a simple health check by including a small utility like wget or by implementing a custom health check in your application that doesn't rely on external tools.

	// Add health check if needed
	// Note: The base image doesn't include wget or curl by default
	// You might want to use a different health check mechanism or a different base image
+	// Basic health check using TCP connection to the port
+	container = container.WithHealthcheck(dagger.ContainerHealthcheckOpts{
+		Test:     []string{"CMD", "nc", "-z", "localhost", "8080"},
+		Interval: 30 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000, // 30s in nanoseconds
+		Timeout:  5 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000,  // 5s in nanoseconds
+		Retries:  3,
+	})

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .dagger/backend/main.go around lines 109 to 112, the health check is
currently missing as noted in the comments. Implement a basic health check
mechanism suitable for the container environment, either by adding a lightweight
utility like wget or curl if the base image supports it, or by coding a custom
health check endpoint within the application itself that can be used to verify
service health without relying on external tools. Alternatively, document
clearly why the health check is deferred if it cannot be implemented now.

"context"
"runtime"

"backend/internal/dagger"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify import path is correct

The import path backend/internal/dagger suggests this is a local import. Ensure this path is correctly set up in your module definition and that the internal directory is at the expected location.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the import path exists and is structured correctly
ls -la backend/internal/dagger 2>/dev/null || echo "Path not found"
cat go.mod 2>/dev/null | grep -A 10 "require" | grep "dagger"

Length of output: 119


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Show the module path declared in the root go.mod
echo "Root go.mod module declaration:"
grep '^module ' go.mod || echo "— none found —"

# Check if backend has its own module
if [ -f backend/go.mod ]; then
  echo -e "\nbackend/go.mod module declaration:"
  grep '^module ' backend/go.mod
else
  echo -e "\nbackend/go.mod not found"
fi

# Check if .dagger/backend has its own module
if [ -f .dagger/backend/go.mod ]; then
  echo -e "\n.dagger/backend/go.mod module declaration:"
  grep '^module ' .dagger/backend/go.mod
else
  echo -e "\n.dagger/backend/go.mod not found"
fi

# Show the first three levels of the backend directory tree
echo -e "\nbackend directory structure (depth 3):"
find backend -maxdepth 3 -type d | sed 's/^\.\///g' || echo "— backend directory not present —"

# Show the first two levels of the .dagger/backend directory tree
echo -e "\n.dagger/backend directory structure (depth 2):"
find .dagger/backend -maxdepth 2 -type d | sed 's/^\.\///g' || echo "— .dagger/backend directory not present —"

Length of output: 805


Fix import path in .dagger/backend/main.go

The import

import "backend/internal/dagger"

does not resolve to any existing package under your declared module (module backend in .dagger/backend/go.mod), nor is there a backend/internal/dagger folder at the repo root. Please correct one of the following:

• If you meant to import your root module’s package, change it to the fully-qualified path from go.mod in / (e.g.):

-import "backend/internal/dagger"
+import "github.com/tuannvm/haproxy-mcp-server/internal/dagger"

• If it really belongs under the .dagger/backend module, add the missing folder:

.dagger/backend/internal/dagger

and ensure the module declaration in .dagger/backend/go.mod matches your import prefix.

Location:

  • .dagger/backend/main.go:7

After updating, run go mod tidy to sync dependencies.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .dagger/backend/main.go at line 7, the import path "backend/internal/dagger"
does not match any existing package under the declared module in
.dagger/backend/go.mod, nor does the folder backend/internal/dagger exist. To
fix this, either update the import path to the fully-qualified module path
declared in the root go.mod if the package belongs to the root module, or create
the missing directory .dagger/backend/internal/dagger and adjust the module
declaration in .dagger/backend/go.mod to match this import path. After making
the changes, run "go mod tidy" in the .dagger/backend directory to update
dependencies.

Comment on lines 22 to 25
return dag.
Golang().
WithSource(b.Source).
Test(ctx)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Undefined dag variable

The code uses a dag variable that isn't declared in this file. This suggests it might be implicitly defined by the dagger framework, but this could lead to confusion for developers unfamiliar with the codebase.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if dag is defined elsewhere in the codebase
grep -r "var dag" .dagger/ --include="*.go"
grep -r "dag :=" .dagger/ --include="*.go"

Length of output: 90


I’d like to inspect the surrounding context to see where—and how—dag is introduced. Let’s dump the top of the file:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Show the first 200 lines to locate the definition of `dag`
sed -n '1,200p' .dagger/backend/main.go

Length of output: 3544


I’d like to inspect the backend/internal/dagger wrapper to see how it’s declared and whether it defines a dag variable or uses package dag. Let’s dump the first 50 lines of each Go file there:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# List and show top of each Go file in the internal dagger package
find backend/internal/dagger -type f -name "*.go" -print -exec sed -n '1,50p' {} \;

Length of output: 145


Let’s locate where the dagger package lives in the repo:

#!/bin/bash
# List directories up to 4 levels deep
find . -maxdepth 4 -type d

# Find all Go files declaring `package dagger`
rg 'package dagger' -n .

Let’s verify whether the dag identifier is ever introduced—either via an import alias or a global/initialized variable—and confirm the import block in this file:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Show the import block (to catch any alias)
grep -R '^import (' -n .dagger/backend/main.go -A5

# Check for an alias pointing to the dagger package
grep -R '^import.*dag ' -n .dagger/backend/main.go

# Search for a global var named dag anywhere
grep -R 'var dag' -n . --include="*.go"

# Search for dag := initializations anywhere
grep -R 'dag\s*:=' -n . --include="*.go"

Length of output: 263


Let's locate the backend/internal/dagger package and inspect its declaration:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify go.mod to understand the module path
if [ -f go.mod ]; then
  echo "=== go.mod ==="
  sed -n '1,20p' go.mod
  echo
else
  echo "No go.mod at repo root"
fi

# Find the dagger package under backend/internal
find . -type f -path "*/backend/internal/dagger/*.go" -print

Length of output: 778


Undefined dag variable in Dagger pipeline – add an import alias or correct the package reference

The calls to dag.Golang() (and similar) in .dagger/backend/main.go refer to an identifier dag that isn’t declared or imported. You have two main options to fix this:

  1. Alias the local wrapper package to dag in the import block:
    – import (
    –     "backend/internal/dagger"
    – )
    + import (
    +     dag "backend/internal/dagger"
    + )
  2. Or, if you meant to use the default package name (dagger), update all uses of dag to dagger:
    – return dag.
    + return dagger.

Either approach will resolve the undefined identifier error.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .dagger/backend/main.go around lines 22 to 25, the variable `dag` is used but
not declared or imported, causing an undefined identifier error. To fix this,
either add an import alias for the local dagger wrapper package as `dag` in the
import block or replace all occurrences of `dag` with the correct package name,
likely `dagger`, to match the actual import. This will ensure the identifier is
properly recognized by the compiler.

@tuannvm tuannvm added this to MCP May 28, 2025
@tuannvm tuannvm moved this to Backlog in MCP May 28, 2025
tuannvm added 5 commits June 4, 2025 19:46
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.dagger/backend/main.go (2)

66-66: Update hardcoded binary name to match project context.

The binary name "greetings-api" is inconsistent with the HAProxy MCP Server project context and comments in the file.

This issue was previously identified in past reviews. The binary name should be updated to match the project's actual binary name.


22-25: Undefined dag variable prevents compilation.

The dag variable is used but not declared, which will cause compilation errors.

This issue was previously identified in past reviews. The dag variable needs to be properly imported or defined.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.dagger/backend/main.go (1)

38-44: Simplify redundant error handling.

The Check method has unnecessary complexity - it immediately returns the same result as Lint without adding any value.

Consider simplifying this method:

-func (b *Backend) Check(ctx context.Context) (string, error) {
-	lint, err := b.Lint(ctx)
-	if err != nil {
-		return "", err
-	}
-	return lint, nil
-}
+func (b *Backend) Check(ctx context.Context) (string, error) {
+	return b.Lint(ctx)
+}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d168f2 and c93b942.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .dagger/backend/main.go (1 hunks)
  • .dagger/main.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .dagger/main.go
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
.dagger/backend/main.go (2)
.dagger/main.go (1)
  • New (23-46)
.dagger/workspace/main.go (1)
  • New (26-37)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: ci

Comment on lines +118 to +125
// Stateless formatter
func (b *Backend) FormatDirectory(
// Directory to format
source *dagger.Directory,
) *dagger.Directory {
b.Source = source
return b.Format()
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix potential race condition in stateless method.

Similar to CheckDirectory, the FormatDirectory method modifies the receiver's Source field, making it stateful and potentially unsafe for concurrent use.

Apply this diff to make the method truly stateless:

-func (b *Backend) FormatDirectory(
-	// Directory to format
-	source *dagger.Directory,
-) *dagger.Directory {
-	b.Source = source
-	return b.Format()
-}
+func (b *Backend) FormatDirectory(
+	// Directory to format
+	source *dagger.Directory,
+) *dagger.Directory {
+	tempBackend := &Backend{Source: source}
+	return tempBackend.Format()
+}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .dagger/backend/main.go around lines 118 to 125, the FormatDirectory method
modifies the receiver's Source field, causing a potential race condition and
making it stateful. To fix this, avoid changing the receiver's state by passing
the source directory as an argument to the Format method or refactoring
FormatDirectory to not assign to b.Source. Ensure the method operates without
side effects on the receiver's fields to make it truly stateless and safe for
concurrent use.

Comment on lines +110 to +116
func (b *Backend) CheckDirectory(
ctx context.Context,
// Directory to run checks on
source *dagger.Directory) (string, error) {
b.Source = source
return b.Check(ctx)
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix potential race condition in stateless method.

The CheckDirectory method modifies the receiver's Source field directly, making it stateful rather than truly stateless. This could cause race conditions if the same Backend instance is used concurrently, and breaks the expected behavior of a "stateless" operation.

Apply this diff to make the method truly stateless:

-func (b *Backend) CheckDirectory(
-	ctx context.Context,
-	// Directory to run checks on
-	source *dagger.Directory) (string, error) {
-	b.Source = source
-	return b.Check(ctx)
-}
+func (b *Backend) CheckDirectory(
+	ctx context.Context,
+	// Directory to run checks on
+	source *dagger.Directory) (string, error) {
+	tempBackend := &Backend{Source: source}
+	return tempBackend.Check(ctx)
+}

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .dagger/backend/main.go around lines 110 to 116, the CheckDirectory method
modifies the Backend receiver's Source field, causing a race condition and
breaking stateless behavior. To fix this, avoid changing the receiver's state by
passing the source directory as a parameter to the Check method or refactoring
Check to accept the directory directly, ensuring CheckDirectory does not modify
any Backend fields and remains stateless.

) *dagger.Directory {
return dag.
Container().
From("golang:1.24").
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify golang version exists.

The hardcoded golang:1.24 image may not exist, as Go versioning typically follows semantic versioning (e.g., 1.23.x). The latest stable version as of 2024 would likely be 1.23 or similar.


🌐 Web query:

What is the latest stable version of Go (golang) and what Docker image tags are available for golang?

💡 Result:

As of June 5, 2025, the latest stable version of Go (Golang) is 1.24.2, released on May 5, 2025. (go.dev)

The official Go Docker images are available on Docker Hub under the golang repository. These images are tagged to reflect the Go version and the underlying operating system. Common tags include:

  • 1.24.2
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • 1.24.2-alpine
  • 1.24.2-bookworm
  • 1.24.2-bullseye
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.21
  • 1.24.2-alpine3.20
  • `

Citations:


Pin Go base image to a valid Docker tag

We verified that the latest stable Go release is 1.24.2 and Docker Hub’s golang repository publishes tags like 1.24.2 (but not a plain 1.24 tag). Please update the base image reference:

• File: .dagger/backend/main.go (line 136)
Replace:

-    From("golang:1.24").
+    From("golang:1.24.2").

If you’d prefer to track the latest patch automatically, confirm that the golang:1.24 alias exists on Docker Hub before relying on it.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
From("golang:1.24").
- From("golang:1.24").
+ From("golang:1.24.2").
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .dagger/backend/main.go at line 136, the base Docker image is specified as
"golang:1.24", which may not exist as an exact tag. Update this to use the full
valid tag "golang:1.24.2" to ensure the image is available. If you want to track
patch updates automatically, verify that the "golang:1.24" alias exists on
Docker Hub before using it; otherwise, pin to the specific patch version
"1.24.2".

tuannvm added 4 commits June 4, 2025 20:24
…function

Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tommy Nguyen <tuannvm@hotmail.com>
@tuannvm tuannvm merged commit 61b6dfd into main Jun 5, 2025
10 checks passed
@tuannvm tuannvm deleted the ci/dagger-agent branch June 5, 2025 03:40
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog to Done in MCP Jun 5, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 5, 2025

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.1.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant