Add DuckDB to RF01 filter for dialects with dot-access #6554
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Brief summary of the change made
fixes #6551
DuckDB, as described on their page about the DuckDB struct type
, allows for "dot"-based access to struct fields.
For example, the following query returns 'there' when executed by DuckDB:
Are there any other side effects of this change that we should be aware of?
Effectively disables non-trivial RF01 checks for all DuckDB queries. As far as I can tell, this is in-line with our current strategy for other languages that allow "dot"-based access, since otherwise we generate far too many false-positives to be useful.
Pull Request checklist
Please confirm you have completed any of the necessary steps below.
Included test cases to demonstrate any code changes, which may be one or more of the following:
.yml
rule test cases intest/fixtures/rules/std_rule_cases
..sql
/.yml
parser test cases intest/fixtures/dialects
(note YML files can be auto generated withtox -e generate-fixture-yml
).test/fixtures/linter/autofix
.Added appropriate documentation for the change.
Created GitHub issues for any relevant followup/future enhancements if appropriate.