Skip to content

Conversation

atztogo
Copy link
Collaborator

@atztogo atztogo commented Jan 25, 2023

As a naming convention of non static function, the function name periodic_niggli_reduce was changed to periodic_niggli_reduce.

In addition, test_niggli_delaunay.py was migrated to pytest from python unittest.

Ping @site-g just for your information.

In addition, test_niggli_delaunay.py was migrated to pytest.
@atztogo atztogo requested a review from lan496 January 25, 2023 06:14
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Base: 93.61% // Head: 93.34% // Decreases project coverage by -0.27% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (6d51ae0) compared to base (bc73d97).
Patch coverage: 87.23% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #223      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    93.61%   93.34%   -0.27%     
===========================================
  Files           15       15              
  Lines          908      902       -6     
===========================================
- Hits           850      842       -8     
- Misses          58       60       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
python/test/test_niggli_delaunay.py 88.88% <87.23%> (-4.45%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Member

@lan496 lan496 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@atztogo atztogo merged commit aee574d into spglib:develop Jan 25, 2023
@atztogo atztogo deleted the niggli branch January 25, 2023 06:42
@LecrisUT
Copy link
Collaborator

LecrisUT commented Mar 1, 2023

This is only internal right? No need to label this change?

@atztogo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

atztogo commented Mar 2, 2023

Thanks for watching it.

This is only internal right?

Correct!

No need to label this change?

I think No.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants