Skip to content

Conversation

LecrisUT
Copy link
Collaborator

This should unblock the CI, but not sure if it catches all coverage correctly

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.20%. Comparing base (f0db532) to head (9e8aa27).
Report is 60 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #545      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    84.24%   77.20%   -7.05%     
===========================================
  Files           26       26              
  Lines         8209     8082     -127     
  Branches      1702     1687      -15     
===========================================
- Hits          6916     6240     -676     
- Misses        1293     1347      +54     
- Partials         0      495     +495     
Flag Coverage Δ
c_api 68.68% <ø> (-6.84%) ⬇️
fortran_api 50.70% <ø> (-5.74%) ⬇️
python_api 73.24% <ø> (-8.32%) ⬇️
unit_tests 11.67% <ø> (-1.93%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@LecrisUT
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Not quite sure why the coverage has changed so much. Maybe it's a difference with gcov in ubuntu 24.04. But for now I guess we can reset the coverage to a new baseline. @lan496 This one also needs force merge though.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Le <git@lecris.dev>
@lan496 lan496 enabled auto-merge January 20, 2025 11:18
@lan496 lan496 merged commit 66b4174 into spglib:develop Jan 20, 2025
52 of 56 checks passed
@LecrisUT LecrisUT deleted the fix/codecov branch January 20, 2025 12:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants