-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 907
[Merged by Bors] - Fix off-by-one in block packing lcli #2878
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
michaelsproul
approved these changes
Jan 7, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
bors r+ |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2022
## Issue Addressed The current `lcli` block packing code has an off-by-one where it would include an extra slot (the oldest slot) of attestations as "available" (this means there would be 33 slots of "available" attestations instead of 32). There is typically only single-digit attestations remaining from that slot and as such does not cause a significant change to the results although every efficiency will have been very slightly under-reported. ## Proposed Changes Prune the `available_attestation_set` before writing out the data instead of after. ## Additional Info This `lcli` code will soon be deprecated by a Lighthouse API (#2879) which will run significantly faster and will be used to hook into our upcoming monitoring platform #2873.
Pull request successfully merged into unstable. Build succeeded: |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2022
## Issue Addressed N/A ## Proposed Changes Add a HTTP API which can be used to compute the block packing data for all blocks over a discrete range of epochs. ## Usage ### Request ``` curl "http:localhost:5052/lighthouse/analysis/block_packing_efficiency?start_epoch=57730&end_epoch=57732" ``` ### Response ``` [ { "slot": "1847360", "block_hash": "0xa7dc230659802df2f99ea3798faede2e75942bb5735d56e6bfdc2df335dcd61f", "proposer_info": { "validator_index": 1686, "graffiti": "" }, "available_attestations": 7096, "included_attestations": 6459, "prior_skip_slots": 0 }, ... ] ``` ## Additional Info This is notably different to the existing lcli code: - Uses `BlockReplayer` #2863 and as such runs significantly faster than the previous method. - Corrects the off-by-one #2878 - Removes the `offline` validators component. This was only a "best guess" and simply was used as a way to determine an estimate of the "true" packing efficiency and was generally not helpful in terms of direct comparisons between different packing methods. As such it has been removed from the API and any future estimates of "offline" validators would be better suited in a separate/more targeted API or as part of 'beacon watch': #2873 - Includes `prior_skip_slots`.
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2022
## Issue Addressed N/A ## Proposed Changes Add a HTTP API which can be used to compute the block packing data for all blocks over a discrete range of epochs. ## Usage ### Request ``` curl "http:localhost:5052/lighthouse/analysis/block_packing_efficiency?start_epoch=57730&end_epoch=57732" ``` ### Response ``` [ { "slot": "1847360", "block_hash": "0xa7dc230659802df2f99ea3798faede2e75942bb5735d56e6bfdc2df335dcd61f", "proposer_info": { "validator_index": 1686, "graffiti": "" }, "available_attestations": 7096, "included_attestations": 6459, "prior_skip_slots": 0 }, ... ] ``` ## Additional Info This is notably different to the existing lcli code: - Uses `BlockReplayer` #2863 and as such runs significantly faster than the previous method. - Corrects the off-by-one #2878 - Removes the `offline` validators component. This was only a "best guess" and simply was used as a way to determine an estimate of the "true" packing efficiency and was generally not helpful in terms of direct comparisons between different packing methods. As such it has been removed from the API and any future estimates of "offline" validators would be better suited in a separate/more targeted API or as part of 'beacon watch': #2873 - Includes `prior_skip_slots`.
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2022
## Issue Addressed N/A ## Proposed Changes Add a HTTP API which can be used to compute the block packing data for all blocks over a discrete range of epochs. ## Usage ### Request ``` curl "http:localhost:5052/lighthouse/analysis/block_packing_efficiency?start_epoch=57730&end_epoch=57732" ``` ### Response ``` [ { "slot": "1847360", "block_hash": "0xa7dc230659802df2f99ea3798faede2e75942bb5735d56e6bfdc2df335dcd61f", "proposer_info": { "validator_index": 1686, "graffiti": "" }, "available_attestations": 7096, "included_attestations": 6459, "prior_skip_slots": 0 }, ... ] ``` ## Additional Info This is notably different to the existing lcli code: - Uses `BlockReplayer` #2863 and as such runs significantly faster than the previous method. - Corrects the off-by-one #2878 - Removes the `offline` validators component. This was only a "best guess" and simply was used as a way to determine an estimate of the "true" packing efficiency and was generally not helpful in terms of direct comparisons between different packing methods. As such it has been removed from the API and any future estimates of "offline" validators would be better suited in a separate/more targeted API or as part of 'beacon watch': #2873 - Includes `prior_skip_slots`.
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2022
## Issue Addressed N/A ## Proposed Changes Add a HTTP API which can be used to compute the block packing data for all blocks over a discrete range of epochs. ## Usage ### Request ``` curl "http:localhost:5052/lighthouse/analysis/block_packing_efficiency?start_epoch=57730&end_epoch=57732" ``` ### Response ``` [ { "slot": "1847360", "block_hash": "0xa7dc230659802df2f99ea3798faede2e75942bb5735d56e6bfdc2df335dcd61f", "proposer_info": { "validator_index": 1686, "graffiti": "" }, "available_attestations": 7096, "included_attestations": 6459, "prior_skip_slots": 0 }, ... ] ``` ## Additional Info This is notably different to the existing lcli code: - Uses `BlockReplayer` #2863 and as such runs significantly faster than the previous method. - Corrects the off-by-one #2878 - Removes the `offline` validators component. This was only a "best guess" and simply was used as a way to determine an estimate of the "true" packing efficiency and was generally not helpful in terms of direct comparisons between different packing methods. As such it has been removed from the API and any future estimates of "offline" validators would be better suited in a separate/more targeted API or as part of 'beacon watch': #2873 - Includes `prior_skip_slots`.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue Addressed
The current
lcli
block packing code has an off-by-one where it would include an extra slot (the oldest slot) of attestations as "available" (this means there would be 33 slots of "available" attestations instead of 32).There is typically only single-digit attestations remaining from that slot and as such does not cause a significant change to the results although every efficiency will have been very slightly under-reported.
Proposed Changes
Prune the
available_attestation_set
before writing out the data instead of after.Additional Info
This
lcli
code will soon be deprecated by a Lighthouse API (#2879) which will run significantly faster and will be used to hook into our upcoming monitoring platform #2873.