Skip to content

Conversation

paulhauner
Copy link
Member

Issue Addressed

NA

Proposed Changes

Adds the initial structure, testing framework and server for our monitoring platform.

This implementation is incomplete and serves as a foundation for future works.

The watch directory added here is not considered production code, therefore it has much less stringent review procedures when compared to other components (e.g., beacon node, validator client).

Additional Info

NA

@paulhauner paulhauner added the work-in-progress PR is a work-in-progress label Dec 22, 2021
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2022
## Issue Addressed

The current `lcli` block packing code has an off-by-one where it would include an extra slot (the oldest slot) of attestations as "available" (this means there would be 33 slots of "available" attestations instead of 32).
There is typically only single-digit attestations remaining from that slot and as such does not cause a significant change to the results although every efficiency will have been very slightly under-reported.

## Proposed Changes

Prune the `available_attestation_set` before writing out the data instead of after.

## Additional Info

This `lcli` code will soon be deprecated by a Lighthouse API (#2879)  which will run significantly faster and will be used to hook into our upcoming monitoring platform #2873.
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2022
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

Add a HTTP API which can be used to compute the attestation performances of a validator (or all validators) over a discrete range of epochs.
Performances can be computed for a single validator, or for the global validator set. 

## Usage
### Request
The API can be used as follows:
```
curl "http://localhost:5052/lighthouse/analysis/attestation_performance/{validator_index}?start_epoch=57730&end_epoch=57732"
```
Alternatively, to compute performances for the global validator set:
```
curl "http://localhost:5052/lighthouse/analysis/attestation_performance/global?start_epoch=57730&end_epoch=57732"
```

### Response
The response is JSON formatted as follows:
```
[
  {
    "index": 72,
    "epochs": {
      "57730": {
        "active": true,
        "head": false,
        "target": false,
        "source": false
      },
      "57731": {
        "active": true,
        "head": true,
        "target": true,
        "source": true,
        "delay": 1
      },
      "57732": {
        "active": true,
        "head": true,
        "target": true,
        "source": true,
        "delay": 1
      },
    }
  }
]
```
> Note that the `"epochs"` are not guaranteed to be in ascending order. 

## Additional Info

- This API is intended to be used in our upcoming validator analysis tooling (#2873) and will likely not be very useful for regular users. Some advanced users or block explorers may find this API useful however.
- The request range is limited to 100 epochs (since the range is inclusive and it also computes the `end_epoch` it's actually 101 epochs) to prevent Lighthouse using exceptionally large amounts of memory.
@paulhauner
Copy link
Member Author

Closing this but leaving the branch to keep a clean list of open PRs.

@paulhauner paulhauner closed this Feb 7, 2022
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2022
## Issue Addressed
N/A

## Proposed Changes
Add a HTTP API which can be used to compute the block packing data for all blocks over a discrete range of epochs.

## Usage
### Request
```
curl "http:localhost:5052/lighthouse/analysis/block_packing_efficiency?start_epoch=57730&end_epoch=57732"
```
### Response
```
[
  {
    "slot": "1847360",
    "block_hash": "0xa7dc230659802df2f99ea3798faede2e75942bb5735d56e6bfdc2df335dcd61f",
    "proposer_info": {
      "validator_index": 1686,
      "graffiti": ""
    },
    "available_attestations": 7096,
    "included_attestations": 6459,
    "prior_skip_slots": 0
  },
  ...
]
```
## Additional Info

This is notably different to the existing lcli code:
- Uses `BlockReplayer` #2863 and as such runs significantly faster than the previous method.
- Corrects the off-by-one #2878
- Removes the `offline` validators component. This was only a "best guess" and simply was used as a way to determine an estimate of the "true" packing efficiency and was generally not helpful in terms of direct comparisons between different packing methods. As such it has been removed from the API and any future estimates of "offline" validators would be better suited in a separate/more targeted API or as part of 'beacon watch': #2873 
- Includes `prior_skip_slots`.
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2022
## Issue Addressed
N/A

## Proposed Changes
Add a HTTP API which can be used to compute the block packing data for all blocks over a discrete range of epochs.

## Usage
### Request
```
curl "http:localhost:5052/lighthouse/analysis/block_packing_efficiency?start_epoch=57730&end_epoch=57732"
```
### Response
```
[
  {
    "slot": "1847360",
    "block_hash": "0xa7dc230659802df2f99ea3798faede2e75942bb5735d56e6bfdc2df335dcd61f",
    "proposer_info": {
      "validator_index": 1686,
      "graffiti": ""
    },
    "available_attestations": 7096,
    "included_attestations": 6459,
    "prior_skip_slots": 0
  },
  ...
]
```
## Additional Info

This is notably different to the existing lcli code:
- Uses `BlockReplayer` #2863 and as such runs significantly faster than the previous method.
- Corrects the off-by-one #2878
- Removes the `offline` validators component. This was only a "best guess" and simply was used as a way to determine an estimate of the "true" packing efficiency and was generally not helpful in terms of direct comparisons between different packing methods. As such it has been removed from the API and any future estimates of "offline" validators would be better suited in a separate/more targeted API or as part of 'beacon watch': #2873 
- Includes `prior_skip_slots`.
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2022
## Issue Addressed
N/A

## Proposed Changes
Add a HTTP API which can be used to compute the block packing data for all blocks over a discrete range of epochs.

## Usage
### Request
```
curl "http:localhost:5052/lighthouse/analysis/block_packing_efficiency?start_epoch=57730&end_epoch=57732"
```
### Response
```
[
  {
    "slot": "1847360",
    "block_hash": "0xa7dc230659802df2f99ea3798faede2e75942bb5735d56e6bfdc2df335dcd61f",
    "proposer_info": {
      "validator_index": 1686,
      "graffiti": ""
    },
    "available_attestations": 7096,
    "included_attestations": 6459,
    "prior_skip_slots": 0
  },
  ...
]
```
## Additional Info

This is notably different to the existing lcli code:
- Uses `BlockReplayer` #2863 and as such runs significantly faster than the previous method.
- Corrects the off-by-one #2878
- Removes the `offline` validators component. This was only a "best guess" and simply was used as a way to determine an estimate of the "true" packing efficiency and was generally not helpful in terms of direct comparisons between different packing methods. As such it has been removed from the API and any future estimates of "offline" validators would be better suited in a separate/more targeted API or as part of 'beacon watch': #2873 
- Includes `prior_skip_slots`.
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2022
## Issue Addressed
N/A

## Proposed Changes
Add a HTTP API which can be used to compute the block packing data for all blocks over a discrete range of epochs.

## Usage
### Request
```
curl "http:localhost:5052/lighthouse/analysis/block_packing_efficiency?start_epoch=57730&end_epoch=57732"
```
### Response
```
[
  {
    "slot": "1847360",
    "block_hash": "0xa7dc230659802df2f99ea3798faede2e75942bb5735d56e6bfdc2df335dcd61f",
    "proposer_info": {
      "validator_index": 1686,
      "graffiti": ""
    },
    "available_attestations": 7096,
    "included_attestations": 6459,
    "prior_skip_slots": 0
  },
  ...
]
```
## Additional Info

This is notably different to the existing lcli code:
- Uses `BlockReplayer` #2863 and as such runs significantly faster than the previous method.
- Corrects the off-by-one #2878
- Removes the `offline` validators component. This was only a "best guess" and simply was used as a way to determine an estimate of the "true" packing efficiency and was generally not helpful in terms of direct comparisons between different packing methods. As such it has been removed from the API and any future estimates of "offline" validators would be better suited in a separate/more targeted API or as part of 'beacon watch': #2873 
- Includes `prior_skip_slots`.
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2023
> This is currently a WIP and all features are subject to alteration or removal at any time.

## Overview

The successor to #2873.

Contains the backbone of `beacon.watch` including syncing code, the initial API, and several core database tables.

See `watch/README.md` for more information, requirements and usage.
ghost pushed a commit to oone-world/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2023
> This is currently a WIP and all features are subject to alteration or removal at any time.

## Overview

The successor to sigp#2873.

Contains the backbone of `beacon.watch` including syncing code, the initial API, and several core database tables.

See `watch/README.md` for more information, requirements and usage.
Woodpile37 pushed a commit to Woodpile37/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2024
> This is currently a WIP and all features are subject to alteration or removal at any time.

The successor to sigp#2873.

Contains the backbone of `beacon.watch` including syncing code, the initial API, and several core database tables.

See `watch/README.md` for more information, requirements and usage.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
work-in-progress PR is a work-in-progress
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant