@alejandro-colomar if I compare the build time for the actions that do any build from this PR:

• CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 4m
• CI / dist-build (pull_request) Successful in 7m
• Static code analysis / codeql (pull_request)Successful in 4m

To the ones from #1237:

• CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 4m
• CI / dist-build (pull_request) Successful in 13m
• Static code analysis / codeql (pull_request) Successful in 7m

It seems like there is a notorious improvement in the last two actions. WDYT?

This accelerates the CI.

Resolves: #1240 Link: https://101010.pl/@nabijaczleweli/114149412203886808 Reported-by: nabijaczleweli nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz

I think Closes: is more common than Resolves: in the projects I've seen.

Here's the Linux kernel:

alx@devuan:~/src/linux/linux/master$ git log --grep '^\(Resolves\|Closes\):' | grep -o '\(Resolves\|Closes\):' | head -n1000 | sort | uniq -c;
   1000 Closes:

Shadow:

alx@devuan:~/src/shadow/shadow/master$ git log --grep '^\(Resolves\|Closes\):' | grep -o '\(Resolves\|Closes\):' | head -n1000 | sort | uniq -c
     44 Closes:
     42 Resolves:

BTW, @nabijaczleweli usually signs as наб <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>, in Cyrillic.

I think Closes: is more common than Resolves: in the projects I've seen.
BTW, @nabijaczleweli usually signs as наб <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>, in Cyrillic.

I updated those two and with your permission I have also added Reviewed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>

Thanks! I'll merge.