Skip to content

Conversation

kkHuang-amd
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

Found NaN value generated after custom all reduce function.
It will cause gsm8k accuracy test failed.

Modifications

Change the empty_like and empty to zeros_like and zeros to ensure the tensor value is initialized to zero

Accuracy Test

python3 benchmark/gsm8k/bench_sglang.py --num-questions 2000 --parallel 2000 100%|███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 1319/1319 [00:51<00:00, 25.58it/s] Accuracy: 0.948 Invalid: 0.000 Latency: 52.566 s Output throughput: 2409.507 token/s

Checklist

@kkHuang-amd kkHuang-amd requested a review from yizhang2077 as a code owner July 29, 2025 13:05
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @kkHuang-amd, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've implemented a fix to prevent NaN values from being generated after our custom all-reduce function, which was previously causing failures in the gsm8k accuracy test. The solution involves changing how certain tensors are initialized within the communication process. Instead of allocating uninitialized memory, these tensors are now explicitly set to zero, ensuring a clean state and preventing the propagation of garbage values that could lead to NaNs.

Highlights

  • NaN Value Fix: The core issue of NaN values appearing after custom all-reduce operations, which was causing accuracy test failures, has been addressed.
  • Tensor Initialization Change: All instances of torch.empty and torch.empty_like used for tensor allocation within the custom all-reduce communication logic have been replaced with torch.zeros and torch.zeros_like. This ensures that all newly created tensors are explicitly initialized to zero, preventing the propagation of uninitialized memory contents that could lead to NaNs.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@kkHuang-amd
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @HaiShaw :

Please check this PR for potential issue fixed

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses a critical bug where NaN values were generated by the custom all-reduce function. The root cause was the use of torch.empty and torch.empty_like for creating buffers and output tensors, which does not guarantee initialization and can lead to using uninitialized memory. The fix correctly replaces these calls with torch.zeros and torch.zeros_like, ensuring all tensors are zero-initialized. This is a robust solution that prevents non-deterministic behavior and correctness issues. The changes are consistent, well-targeted, and look good to me.

Copy link
Collaborator

@HaiShaw HaiShaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@HaiShaw
Copy link
Collaborator

HaiShaw commented Jul 30, 2025

@yizhang2077 pls have a review

@zhyncs zhyncs merged commit 4a6e7a6 into sgl-project:main Jul 31, 2025
280 of 334 checks passed
@Alcanderian
Copy link
Collaborator

Alcanderian commented Aug 1, 2025

But this change will introduce an extra memset kernel and will slow down performance. cc @zhyncs @HaiShaw @ispobock

@zhyncs
Copy link
Member

zhyncs commented Aug 1, 2025

huangzhilin-hzl pushed a commit to huangzhilin-hzl/sglang that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2025
huangzhilin-hzl pushed a commit to huangzhilin-hzl/sglang that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2025
@kkHuang-amd kkHuang-amd deleted the fix-tensor-nan branch August 1, 2025 08:01
TianQiLin666666 pushed a commit to TianQiLin666666/sglang that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2025
narutolhy pushed a commit to narutolhy/sglang that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2025
narutolhy pushed a commit to narutolhy/sglang that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants