-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
Lianmin/simplify memory pool #7202
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @merrymercy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request aims to simplify the memory pool implementation by removing specific compiled helper functions that were potentially problematic or underperforming. It also adjusts the logic for retrieving KV cache buffer information to correctly handle layer indexing based on a starting layer offset.
Highlights
- Remove Compiled Functions: Removed the
@torch.compile
decorated functionsfused_downcast
andcopy_two_array
from the memory pool implementation. A comment indicatedcopy_two_array
was slower in unit tests. - Adjust Layer Indexing: Modified the
get_contiguous_buf_infos
method to iterate over layers usingrange(self.start_layer, self.start_layer + self.layer_num)
instead of justrange(self.layer_num)
. This change affects how KV cache buffer information is retrieved, likely to support models with a specific range of layers or handle layer offsets. - Add Debug Method: Added an empty
debug_print
method to theMemoryPool
class.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request simplifies the memory pool by removing @torch.compile
d functions that were reportedly underperforming. It updates import statements, adds a debug_print
method (currently a stub), and corrects the loop logic in KVCache.get_contiguous_buf_infos
to properly handle layer indexing based on start_layer
. My main feedback is to implement the debug_print
method to provide useful state information. A more detailed PR description would also improve clarity.
self.get_key_buffer(i).data_ptr() | ||
for i in range(self.start_layer, self.start_layer + self.layer_num) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -182,6 +182,9 @@ def __init__( | |||
def available_size(self): | |||
return len(self.free_slots) | |||
|
|||
def debug_print(self) -> str: | |||
return "" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The new debug_print
method is a helpful addition for diagnostics. Currently, it returns an empty string. To make it immediately useful, you might consider having it return some basic information about the allocator's state. For example, it could include details like the total number of slots, the number of free slots, and the page size.
return "" | |
return f"TokenToKVPoolAllocator(size={self.size}, free_slots={len(self.free_slots)}, page_size={self.page_size})" |
No description provided.