Skip to content

Conversation

merrymercy
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @merrymercy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to simplify the memory pool implementation by removing specific compiled helper functions that were potentially problematic or underperforming. It also adjusts the logic for retrieving KV cache buffer information to correctly handle layer indexing based on a starting layer offset.

Highlights

  • Remove Compiled Functions: Removed the @torch.compile decorated functions fused_downcast and copy_two_array from the memory pool implementation. A comment indicated copy_two_array was slower in unit tests.
  • Adjust Layer Indexing: Modified the get_contiguous_buf_infos method to iterate over layers using range(self.start_layer, self.start_layer + self.layer_num) instead of just range(self.layer_num). This change affects how KV cache buffer information is retrieved, likely to support models with a specific range of layers or handle layer offsets.
  • Add Debug Method: Added an empty debug_print method to the MemoryPool class.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request simplifies the memory pool by removing @torch.compiled functions that were reportedly underperforming. It updates import statements, adds a debug_print method (currently a stub), and corrects the loop logic in KVCache.get_contiguous_buf_infos to properly handle layer indexing based on start_layer. My main feedback is to implement the debug_print method to provide useful state information. A more detailed PR description would also improve clarity.

Comment on lines +320 to +321
self.get_key_buffer(i).data_ptr()
for i in range(self.start_layer, self.start_layer + self.layer_num)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Using range(self.start_layer, self.start_layer + self.layer_num) correctly accounts for the possibility that this KVCache instance manages a subset of layers starting from self.start_layer, ensuring the correct buffers are accessed.

@@ -182,6 +182,9 @@ def __init__(
def available_size(self):
return len(self.free_slots)

def debug_print(self) -> str:
return ""
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The new debug_print method is a helpful addition for diagnostics. Currently, it returns an empty string. To make it immediately useful, you might consider having it return some basic information about the allocator's state. For example, it could include details like the total number of slots, the number of free slots, and the page size.

Suggested change
return ""
return f"TokenToKVPoolAllocator(size={self.size}, free_slots={len(self.free_slots)}, page_size={self.page_size})"

@merrymercy merrymercy merged commit a6305c7 into main Jun 15, 2025
2 of 48 checks passed
@merrymercy merrymercy deleted the lianmin/simplify-memory-pool branch June 15, 2025 05:25
coco-alen pushed a commit to jinleic/sglang that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant