Fix a minor bug related to DeepGEMM upgrade #7191
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @zhijian-liu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a minor compatibility issue related to the DeepGEMM library integration. It introduces conditional logic when calling a DeepGEMM function to correctly handle argument passing depending on the library version being used, thereby fixing a potential bug introduced by a DeepGEMM upgrade.
Highlights
- DeepGEMM Compatibility: Modified the
grouped_gemm_nt_f8f8bf16_maskedfunction call to conditionally pass therecipeargument based on theDEEPGEMM_V202506flag. This ensures compatibility with different versions of the DeepGEMM library, specifically handling potential changes in argument requirements in newer versions.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses a bug related to DeepGEMM upgrades by conditionally passing the recipe argument. The code change is concise and uses a common Python idiom for this purpose.
To enhance the overall quality of the pull request, I recommend the following:
- PR Description: Please fill out the pull request description. Providing context about the bug and the fix helps reviewers and serves as valuable documentation for future developers.
- Unit Tests: For bug fixes, it's highly beneficial to add unit tests. This ensures the fix works as expected and helps prevent regressions. Consider adding tests that cover scenarios with both older and newer (DEEPGEMM_V202506) versions of DeepGEMM to verify the
recipeargument handling.
My review includes one suggestion for an inline comment to improve code clarity.
recipeis introduced in the latest DeepGEMM, so adding version check to conditionally include this argument.Checklist