-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
Minor add utility to read expert distribution recorder output #7134
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @fzyzcjy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request adds a minor utility to the eplb_simulator
package. The main purpose is to provide a convenient way to load and process data generated by the ExpertDistributionRecorder
, enabling easier analysis of expert distribution patterns recorded during model execution.
Highlights
- New Utility Module: Introduced a new module
sglang.srt.eplb_simulator.reader
to provide utilities for reading recorded expert distribution data. - Data Reading Function: Added the
read_mode_per_pass
function within the new reader module to load and aggregate expert distribution data saved in.pt
files, specifically designed for data recorded in 'per_pass' mode.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request introduces read_mode_per_pass
in reader.py
to process output from ExpertDistributionRecorder
in per_pass
mode. It reads .pt
files, aggregates global_physical_count
data, and returns it with metadata.
The review focuses on robustness, correctness (deterministic processing, handling no input files), efficiency (memory usage), and code clarity (removing debug prints).
|
||
# gpc := global_physical_count | ||
gpc_of_forward_pass_and_rank = defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict()) | ||
for path in tqdm(list(dir_data.glob("*.pt"))): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Loading all file paths into memory at once with list(dir_data.glob("*.pt"))
can be memory-intensive if dir_data
contains many files. Also, the iteration order from dir_data.glob("*.pt")
is not guaranteed, which affects last_physical_to_logical_map
.
If a specific last_physical_to_logical_map
is critical, sort the paths explicitly: file_paths = sorted(list(dir_data.glob("*.pt")))
. If any last_physical_to_logical_map
is acceptable, iterate directly over the generator dir_data.glob("*.pt")
for better memory efficiency. Clarify the intended behavior for last_physical_to_logical_map
with a comment.
# Option 1: If a specific order is needed:
# file_paths_to_process = sorted(list(dir_data.glob("*.pt")))
# Option 2: If order doesn't matter and memory efficiency is prioritized:
file_paths_to_process = dir_data.glob("*.pt")
for path in tqdm(file_paths_to_process):
gpc_of_forward_pass_and_rank = defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict()) | ||
for path in tqdm(list(dir_data.glob("*.pt"))): | ||
data_pack = torch.load(path, weights_only=True) | ||
last_physical_to_logical_map = data_pack["last_physical_to_logical_map"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code doesn't handle the case where dir_data.glob("*.pt")
yields no files. last_physical_to_logical_map
(line 23) would not be assigned, potentially leading to a NameError
on line 49. items
(line 37) would remain empty, and torch.stack(items)
(line 44) would raise an error.
Initialize last_physical_to_logical_map
to a default value (e.g., None
) before the loop and check if items
is empty before calling torch.stack
. If no files are processed, return default/empty structures or raise a FileNotFoundError
.
] | ||
|
||
forward_pass_ids = sorted(gpc_of_forward_pass_and_rank.keys()) | ||
print(f"Make {forward_pass_ids=} into array") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
items.append(gpc_of_rank_tensor) | ||
|
||
gpc_of_forward_pass = torch.stack(items) | ||
print(f"{gpc_of_forward_pass.shape=}") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can ignore ci since this adds a new file and will not affect any existing things, and I have tested that file locally |
Motivation
Modifications
Checklist