Do not run frontend_reasoning.ipynb to reduce the CI load #7073
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @merrymercy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request aims to optimize the CI pipeline by preventing the execution or inclusion of a specific Jupyter notebook (frontend_reasoning.ipynb) during the documentation build. This change should help decrease the overall time and resources consumed by the CI checks.
Highlights
- CI Optimization: I've removed the
frontend_reasoning.ipynbnotebook from the documentation build process to reduce continuous integration load.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to reduce CI load by not running the frontend_reasoning.ipynb notebook. The current change removes this notebook from the documentation's table of contents in docs/index.rst.
My primary feedback, detailed in the comment on docs/index.rst, is that while this removal will prevent the notebook from appearing in the generated documentation, it likely does not prevent the notebook from being executed if your CI process uses the make compile target defined in docs/Makefile. This Makefile target is configured to execute all notebooks it finds. Therefore, to fully achieve the stated goal of reducing CI load by not running frontend_reasoning.ipynb, additional modifications (such as deleting the notebook file or updating the Makefile to exclude it from execution) would likely be necessary. Without these, the notebook may still be executed, and the intended CI load reduction might not be realized.
No description provided.