Skip to content

Conversation

zhyncs
Copy link
Member

@zhyncs zhyncs commented Jun 10, 2025

This reverts commit fe55947.

Motivation

Modifications

Checklist

@zhyncs zhyncs merged commit 2f58445 into main Jun 10, 2025
0 of 46 checks passed
@zhyncs zhyncs deleted the zhyncs/r branch June 10, 2025 19:43
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @zhyncs, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've summarized this pull request which aims to undo a previous change that implemented a check to ensure all test files were accounted for in the test suite configuration. The revert removes this validation logic and the associated list of files that were previously marked as excluded from CI.

Highlights

  • Revert Sanity Check: This pull request reverts the changes introduced in PR #6947, which added a sanity check to test/srt/run_suite.py to verify that all test files were either included in a test suite or explicitly listed in a __not_in_ci__ section.
  • Remove Excluded File List: As part of the revert, the large __not_in_ci__ dictionary entry that listed numerous test files intended to be excluded from the CI run is removed from test/srt/run_suite.py.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request reverts commit fe55947a, which had introduced sanity checks to ensure all test files are accounted for in the CI configuration.

Motivation for Revert:
The PR description currently lacks details on why this revert is necessary. Could you please update the "Motivation" section to explain the reasons? Understanding the context (e.g., if the original check was causing issues such as performance degradation, maintenance overhead for the exclusion list, or if an alternative mechanism is now in place) is crucial for a comprehensive review.

Impact of Reverting:
By removing the _sanity_check_suites function and the associated __not_in_ci__ list, an automated safeguard against unintentionally omitting test files from CI is being eliminated. This change could potentially lead to gaps in test coverage if new test files are added to the repository but not correctly configured to run in CI. It would be valuable to understand how this potential risk will be mitigated going forward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant