Skip to content

Conversation

merrymercy
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @merrymercy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to resolve a specific bug affecting the 'eagle' speculative decoding functionality when deployed on AMD systems. The change involves a small but crucial adjustment in the utility code to ensure proper variable initialization, which likely addresses a difference in behavior or state handling on AMD compared to other architectures.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: Addressed an issue potentially causing errors or incorrect behavior for the 'eagle' feature specifically when running on AMD hardware.
  • Code Robustness: Improved the robustness of the generate_attn_arg_prefill function by ensuring a critical variable (paged_kernel_lens_sum) is explicitly calculated if it's not provided, preventing potential None related issues.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a modification in EagleDraftInput.generate_attn_arg_prefill to handle cases where paged_kernel_lens_sum might be None. This is presented as a fix for "eagle on AMD". The core change involves calculating paged_kernel_lens_sum using cum_kv_seq_len[-1] if it's initially None. This fallback calculation appears to be logically sound.

To enhance the clarity and maintainability of this change, I recommend the following:

  • Update Type Hint: Consider updating the type hint for the paged_kernel_lens_sum parameter in the generate_attn_arg_prefill method signature from int to Optional[int]. This would accurately reflect that None is a permissible and handled value.
  • Elaborate in PR Description: Please add a description to this pull request. Explaining the circumstances under which paged_kernel_lens_sum could be None, particularly in the context of AMD platforms, would provide valuable insight for current and future reviewers and maintainers.

Overall, the change is specific and seems to address a robustness issue effectively.

@merrymercy merrymercy requested a review from zhyncs as a code owner June 10, 2025 12:07
@merrymercy merrymercy merged commit 019851d into main Jun 10, 2025
8 of 49 checks passed
@merrymercy merrymercy deleted the lianmin/fix-eagle-on-amd branch June 10, 2025 12:22
almaslof pushed a commit to mpashkovskii/sglang that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2025
jianan-gu pushed a commit to jianan-gu/sglang that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
Yuechguo pushed a commit to Yuechguo/sglang that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant